* git-subtree Next Round Ready
@ 2012-03-25 22:06 greened
2012-03-28 22:45 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: greened @ 2012-03-25 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: git
Ok, I've cleaned things up with git-subtree so the changes I had to the
test infrastructure are gone. No changes to upstream are needed to
support git-subtree in contrib/ now.
As usual, the branches are here:
git://sources.obbligato.org/git/git.git
gitweb here: http://sources.obbligato.org/?p=git.git;a=summary
There are three branches. master is the usual. "subtree-latest" is my
version of git-subtree cleaned up for upstreaming into contrib/. This
is the pure git-subtree history, ready to be subtree merged.
"subtree-integrated" is a version of upstream git.git with
subtree-latest merged as a subtree (done via git-subtree!).
I assume it will be easier to have Junio or another integrator do the
subtree merge from subtree-latest in his or her workarea but I provide
subtree-integrated so everyone can easily check out what it will look
like.
Let me know of anything else you need.
Thanks!
-Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: git-subtree Next Round Ready
2012-03-25 22:06 git-subtree Next Round Ready greened
@ 2012-03-28 22:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-01 18:00 ` greened
2012-04-10 3:34 ` greened
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2012-03-28 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw
To: greened; +Cc: git
greened@obbligato.org writes:
> There are three branches. master is the usual. "subtree-latest" is my
> version of git-subtree cleaned up for upstreaming into contrib/. This
> is the pure git-subtree history, ready to be subtree merged.
> "subtree-integrated" is a version of upstream git.git with
> subtree-latest merged as a subtree (done via git-subtree!).
I do not see the point of your subtree branch, especially after 1f30551
(Set TEST_DIRECTORY, 2012-03-20) where it starts depending on files
outside its top-level directory. At that point, the tree ceases to be
viable as a standalone project.
I think it would make more sense, from the history viewpoint, to:
- Stop the history of the "subtree" branch at commit d3a04e0 (Use Test
Harness, 2012-01-29);
- Create "for-upstream" branch that is a fork of 1.7.10 (when tagged);
- On "for-upstream" branch, add all the files from d3a04e0 (Use Test
Harness, 2012-01-29) to contrib/subtree, and record it as a merge
between 1.7.10 and d3a04e0 (you can use subtree merge for this); and
finally
- Replay the commits between d3a04e0 and the tip of your current
"subtree" branch on top of "for-upstream".
And then have me pull the "for-upstream" branch.
Further development after that point can continue in-tree just like any
other contrib subsystems like "completion/" and "fast-import/git-p4".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: git-subtree Next Round Ready
2012-03-28 22:45 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2012-04-01 18:00 ` greened
2012-04-10 3:34 ` greened
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: greened @ 2012-04-01 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> I do not see the point of your subtree branch, especially after 1f30551
> (Set TEST_DIRECTORY, 2012-03-20) where it starts depending on files
> outside its top-level directory. At that point, the tree ceases to be
> viable as a standalone project.
The point of the branch was to provide an easy reference to subtree
merge into the main git repository. I have no intention of keeping a
separate git-subtree project.
> I think it would make more sense, from the history viewpoint, to:
>
> - Stop the history of the "subtree" branch at commit d3a04e0 (Use Test
> Harness, 2012-01-29);
>
> - Create "for-upstream" branch that is a fork of 1.7.10 (when tagged);
>
> - On "for-upstream" branch, add all the files from d3a04e0 (Use Test
> Harness, 2012-01-29) to contrib/subtree, and record it as a merge
> between 1.7.10 and d3a04e0 (you can use subtree merge for this); and
> finally
>
> - Replay the commits between d3a04e0 and the tip of your current
> "subtree" branch on top of "for-upstream".
>
> And then have me pull the "for-upstream" branch.
Ok, that sounds fine to me.
> Further development after that point can continue in-tree just like any
> other contrib subsystems like "completion/" and "fast-import/git-p4".
Yep, sounds good!
-Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: git-subtree Next Round Ready
2012-03-28 22:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-01 18:00 ` greened
@ 2012-04-10 3:34 ` greened
2012-04-10 16:02 ` Junio C Hamano
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: greened @ 2012-04-10 3:34 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> I think it would make more sense, from the history viewpoint, to:
>
> - Stop the history of the "subtree" branch at commit d3a04e0 (Use Test
> Harness, 2012-01-29);
>
> - Create "for-upstream" branch that is a fork of 1.7.10 (when tagged);
>
> - On "for-upstream" branch, add all the files from d3a04e0 (Use Test
> Harness, 2012-01-29) to contrib/subtree, and record it as a merge
> between 1.7.10 and d3a04e0 (you can use subtree merge for this); and
> finally
>
> - Replay the commits between d3a04e0 and the tip of your current
> "subtree" branch on top of "for-upstream".
All right, this should be ready to go.
git clone git://sources.obbligato.org/git/git.git
Branch is "for-upstream."
Also accessible via gitweb.
-Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: git-subtree Next Round Ready
2012-04-10 3:34 ` greened
@ 2012-04-10 16:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-10 18:12 ` greened
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2012-04-10 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: greened; +Cc: git
greened@obbligato.org writes:
> All right, this should be ready to go.
>
> git clone git://sources.obbligato.org/git/git.git
>
> Branch is "for-upstream."
I'll pull this directly to 'master' as this touches nothing outside
contrib/subtree/ directory.
If this will eventually become part of git-core, the default set for
$(prefix) in contrib/subtree/Makefile may want to watch what we set in the
toplevel Makefile, but minor things like that can be tweaked in-tree.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: git-subtree Next Round Ready
2012-04-10 16:02 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2012-04-10 18:12 ` greened
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: greened @ 2012-04-10 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> I'll pull this directly to 'master' as this touches nothing outside
> contrib/subtree/ directory.
Thanks!
> If this will eventually become part of git-core, the default set for
> $(prefix) in contrib/subtree/Makefile may want to watch what we set in the
> toplevel Makefile, but minor things like that can be tweaked in-tree.
Yeah, I thought about that but I didn't know the best way to grab the
default from the Makefile.
It should be easy to move this to git-core. The top-level Makefile
should just work when the files are moved out of contrib.
Thanks for integrating this. Then I can look at Herman's changes and
then maybe we can talk about what we need to do to move this to
git-core.
-Dave
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-10 18:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-25 22:06 git-subtree Next Round Ready greened
2012-03-28 22:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-01 18:00 ` greened
2012-04-10 3:34 ` greened
2012-04-10 16:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-10 18:12 ` greened
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).