From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git pull --no-ff documentation Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 13:24:40 -0700 Message-ID: <7vmx06aqk7.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vsj9yerbh.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7EAC0E5241D6431599764E90FA821FCF@PhilipOakley> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Cc: =?utf-8?B?5LmZ6YW46Yuw?= , To: "Philip Oakley" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 01 22:24:58 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TImXv-0006vG-5l for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:24:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754119Ab2JAUYp (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:24:45 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:50956 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752234Ab2JAUYo (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:24:44 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2BC9B5B; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:24:43 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=HrTgVpOwq+NhErB4GoRhbu3Luxo=; b=k0ILll jtU44YKGXzru0RoShWdrDmHIBJep3nRByDjz/ca3PA4Cix9q80YiOUZymbXgaYZe R1Tw5nb224vho0oIHLxLh1hmjW0j/xWANwc0Gzbm8ZJKskETomncUy442IcPzSM5 Pdf9FODFgIxzwQvDx21yuAyOZoUjiEbcFH7eM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ZDwmc1gHo6zwacoo/wEqTCt5wSgKfuqi 3rdqUCYKFgaNmk67dpuruIe8zhX4Ee3XnQ6meYGq3Gbfk8+e0KXoH3riqAx0TMfu AEMq3iAjT+UNeHiIENR3q3v0n1wMAtZYEzimyRv1RySlHeSvzsF3S2yVm9YD2N5t TNrGT3ONVpI= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9659B5A; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:24:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F0ECE9B59; Mon, 1 Oct 2012 16:24:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <7EAC0E5241D6431599764E90FA821FCF@PhilipOakley> (Philip Oakley's message of "Mon, 1 Oct 2012 20:54:59 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 08B4F778-0C06-11E2-A992-BB652E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Philip Oakley" writes: >> This actually is not about --no-ff but about --no-tags. Any option >> that "pull" itself does not care about stops the command line parser >> and the remainder of the command line is fed to underlying "fetch". >> > > Should this be said within the documentation's synopsis ? > > e.g. > git pull [pull_options] [merge_options] [fetch_options [ > […]] We certainly could do that, but I was hoping somebody would volunteer to make it easier to the end users so that they do not have to remember which one is which. The "perhaps something like this?" patch was a hint to show the first step in that preferrable direction.