From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ask for "git program" when asking for "git-program" over SSH connection Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:42:42 -0700 Message-ID: <7vlk0t1kdp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vk5ge8bm5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080625120832.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> <7v1w2m8ahi.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vprq66vqd.fsf_-_@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080625034538.GW11793@spearce.org> <7vk5ge6soc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080625044409.GE11793@spearce.org> <7v8wwu6qxr.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v4p7i6qs1.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vy74u5bkk.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080625130646.GD20361@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJDcbKEI=?= =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCJGkkJCQ3JEokSiQzGyhC?= , Miklos Vajna , pclouds@gmail.com, Johannes Schindelin , Pieter de Bie , git@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Tso X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 25 19:44:05 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KBZ2D-0006S1-NU for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:43:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752226AbYFYRnB (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:43:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752622AbYFYRnB (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:43:01 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:55568 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752206AbYFYRnA (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:43:00 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C966E1AF66; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:42:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4E1E1AF61; Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:42:44 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 268FE028-42DE-11DD-A642-CE28B26B55AE-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Theodore Tso writes: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 10:27:07PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > ... >> The above 6 and 12 are yanked out of thin air and I am of course open to >> tweaking them, but I think the above order of events would be workable. > > Is that really 6 and 12 months, or "6/12 months or at the next major > release boundary, whichever is later". Sigh... I thought you by now knew me better than that... Yes, I didn't say it explicitly because I thought it was too obvious, which was a mistake. These except for the ones that are preparation (such as "prepare daemon so that future clients can ask with non-dash forms") need to happen at release boundaries, but these 6/12 months figures set the minimums. E.g. even if we had 6 week release cycles and 1.7.0 were to be done 6 weeks after 1.6.0, that is still too early for the client side to switch asking for "git program".