From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [BUG?] gc and impatience Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 08:24:21 -0700 Message-ID: <7vk3k0not6.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra , Git List To: Duy Nguyen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 05 17:24:29 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V6Me5-000869-0E for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 17:24:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753167Ab3HEPYZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:24:25 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:57537 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752789Ab3HEPYY (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:24:24 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442F436A19; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:24:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=HOT2woDd6wvvm4IsR7JnShmBlzM=; b=uxvKDK nNjoHNM9hnPOBSGXU3rmpTmAgSdgjjxZjcSaEqvmx63rWEWLfHI5iZH98emuIU7n jqrmuFwpov7ZCvuiBhkha4KfxUAkPkWxWE7K4bVPywWq+veAI2qz4Dizn6rdz1oF KjI54ZwZ89ELiQbaDbqoPsby3ZY19U4CUhmfE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=DLh3S+ZptF2ZnIZ88COrxRtMJ3ygovnw ihlrO/dXXg6vnh21CaD/CqUeaEwiXx3JWogaaGmmGosVBcmCCuJVvd79iUzrpQRu pg8W8dS8q3nZ1sJdzpvegsINXI+LoZc1ZUxphvNixW9wsbx8b/69AK3EwiCe4YXP NdmnFCXuZj4= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A5B36A18; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:24:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [50.161.4.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9910136A11; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 15:24:22 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Duy Nguyen's message of "Sat, 3 Aug 2013 12:25:11 +0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1AF74542-FDE3-11E2-9DDD-E84251E3A03C-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Duy Nguyen writes: > I worry less about this. It's not the right model to have two machines > modify the same shared repository (gc --auto is only triggered when we > think there are new objects) even though I think we support it. I am a bit hesitant to dismiss with "It's not the right model", as the original of accessing the repository from two terminals while one clearly is being accessed busily by gc falls into the same category. > If > it's two _scripts_ modifying the same repo, I don't care as this is > more about user interaction. It can very well be two terminals, one on one machine each, both with the same human end-user interaction.