From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] http.c: prompt for SSL client certificate password Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:59:16 -0700 Message-ID: <7viqj2e2zv.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1243480563-5954-1-git-send-email-lodatom@gmail.com> <20090612084209.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Mark Lodato , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Nanako Shiraishi X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 12 01:59:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MEuB3-00050r-BP for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:59:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757455AbZFKX7Q (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:59:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755049AbZFKX7P (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:59:15 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:64641 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753090AbZFKX7P (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:59:15 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090611235916.LFIT20430.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:59:16 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.225.240.211]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 2nzG1c00X4aMwMQ04nzGab; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:59:17 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=ZkqYN0c8iNwA:10 a=Z2nhhV3jvI0A:10 a=UQnXkbzPAAAA:8 a=VXS7YyLET2W0mWfvAOAA:9 a=s2lAcL2y7zym7wY0WX_l_o4m8y0A:4 a=Q21-j9j7q-gA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 In-Reply-To: <20090612084209.6117@nanako3.lavabit.com> (Nanako Shiraishi's message of "Fri\, 12 Jun 2009 08\:42\:09 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Nanako Shiraishi writes: > It would be ideal if you can inspect the certificate and decide if you > need to ask for decrypting password before using it (and otherwise you > don't ask). If you can't do that, probably you can introduce a config > var that says "this certificate is encrypted", and bypass your new code > if that config var isn't set. True, and true.