git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Robin Rosenberg <robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: always respect core.worktree if set
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 01:16:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7viqbrv4pa.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1261979704-30074-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> ("Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy"'s message of "Mon\, 28 Dec 2009 12\:55\:04 +0700")

Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy  <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:

> In the beginning, there was GIT_DIR environment variable, with a very
> simple semantics:
> ...

(Omitted an explanation of how GIT_DIR and core.worktree work together).

> According to the current documentation, if GIT_DIR is not set,
> core.worktree is not respected, and the parent directory of the "git
> directory" may be used as worktree. This case, unless core.worktree
> matches the parent directory of the "git directory" in question, seems
> a misconfiguration and nothing else. So remove this part of the
> documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Junio may find the description highly familiar :) only slightly modified
>  at the end

I found it familiar, but I didn't see how that earlier part leads to the
conclusion in, or even gives a necessary background information for, the
last paragraph.  Perhaps you omitted something in the middle that was more
relevant?  If so, I would suggest omiting the earlier part, whose purpose
was to prepare readers for that middle part, as well.

And I don't think the claim your last paragraph makes is consistent with
what the patch does at all.

Removing the "it will be ignored" from the documentation is a good change
only in the sense that it makes the document closer to reality, but "it is
a misconfiguration" is not a good justification of the change.

A documentation-only patch that can be justitifed by "a misconfiguration"
claim would probably read like this:

	The value of core.worktree in a ".git/config" is honored even when
	it differs from the directory that has the ".git" directory as its
	subdirectory.  This is likely to be a misconfiguration, so warn
	users about it.  Also, drop the part of the documentation that
	incorrectly claimed that we ignore such a misconfigured value.

	---

	core.worktree::
                Set the path to the root of the work tree.  Note that this
        	is honored even when set in a configuration file in a
        	".git" subdirectory of a directory, and its value differs
        	from the latter directory (e.g. "/path/to/.git/config" has
        	core.worktree set to "/different/path"), which is most
        	likely a misconfiguration.  Running git commands in
        	"/path/to" directory will still use "/different/path" as
        	the root of the work tree and can cause great confusion to
        	the users.


Your earlier patch took a different approach to the misconfiguration.  "It
is an error, so we silently _ignore_".  It is a valid thing to say, but
the "silently" part is not friendly to the user and we would probably want
to diagnose and warn.  That is what I originally meant.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-28  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-07 10:15 core.worktree bug Robin Rosenberg
2009-12-15 16:30 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2009-12-27 13:28 ` [PATCH] Fix core.worktree being used when GIT_DIR is not set Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2009-12-27 20:58   ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-28  0:08     ` Robin Rosenberg
2009-12-28  5:41     ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2009-12-28  5:55       ` [PATCH] Documentation: always respect core.worktree if set Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2009-12-28  9:16         ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-12-29  7:48           ` Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2009-12-29 16:58             ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-29 17:05               ` Robin Rosenberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7viqbrv4pa.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).