From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Kong Lucien <Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr,
Duperray Valentin <Valentin.Duperray@ensimag.imag.fr>,
Jonas Franck <Franck.Jonas@ensimag.imag.fr>,
Nguy Thomas <Thomas.Nguy@ensimag.imag.fr>,
Nguyen Huynh Khoi Nguyen Lucien
<Huynh-Khoi-Nguyen.Nguyen@ensimag.imag.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 3/3] Advices about 'git rm' during conflicts (unmerged paths) more relevant
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 11:44:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vipfdzeyu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1338384216-18782-3-git-send-email-Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> (Kong Lucien's message of "Wed, 30 May 2012 15:23:36 +0200")
Kong Lucien <Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr> writes:
> static void wt_status_print_unmerged_header(struct wt_status *s)
> {
> + int i;
> + int simple_deleted_flag = 0;
> + int both_deleted_flag = 0;
> + int not_deleted_flag = 0;
> const char *c = color(WT_STATUS_HEADER, s);
>
> status_printf_ln(s, c, _("Unmerged paths:"));
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < s->change.nr; i++) {
> + struct string_list_item *it = &(s->change.items[i]);
> + struct wt_status_change_data *d = it->util;
> +
> + if (d->stagemask == 1 && !both_deleted_flag)
> + both_deleted_flag = 1;
> + else if ((d->stagemask == 3 || d->stagemask == 5) && !simple_deleted_flag)
> + simple_deleted_flag = 1;
> + else if ((d->stagemask == 2 || d->stagemask == 4 || d->stagemask == 6 ||
> + d->stagemask == 7) && !not_deleted_flag)
> + not_deleted_flag = 1;
> + }
Yuck. Do you need to "&& !flag" in any of these?
switch (d->stagemask) {
case 1:
both_deleted = 1;
break;
case 3:
case 5:
simple_deleted = 1;
break;
default:
not_deleted = 1;
break;
}
Also, I think "simple deleted" is grossly misnamed. It is "one side
deleted, other side possibly modified", isn't it? Because it is
almost always safe to resolve "both sides deleted" to a deletion,
but "one deleted, the other modified" needs a lot more thought to
resolve correctly, it is a much more complex case. I'd call it
del_mod_conflict or something if I were writing this code.
In any case, drop "_flag" from the names. They are annoying and do
not add much value.
> if (!advice_status_hints)
> return;
> if (s->whence != FROM_COMMIT)
> @@ -142,7 +160,16 @@ static void wt_status_print_unmerged_header(struct wt_status *s)
> status_printf_ln(s, c, _(" (use \"git reset %s <file>...\" to unstage)"), s->reference);
> else
> status_printf_ln(s, c, _(" (use \"git rm --cached <file>...\" to unstage)"));
> - status_printf_ln(s, c, _(" (use \"git add/rm <file>...\" as appropriate to mark resolution)"));
> +
> + if (!both_deleted_flag)
If you meant the control flow to follow your indentation, I think
you are missing opening "{" at the end of the above line.
> + if (!simple_deleted_flag)
> + status_printf_ln(s, c, _(" (use \"git add <file>...\" as appropriate to mark resolution)"));
Nobody deleted, so we do not suggest "rm" as resolution, which makes
sense.
As far as I know, in the current message we say "as appropriate"
because we leave the choice of add/rm to the end user. Do you still
need "as appropriate" after deciding that "add" is the only choice
for the user?
> + else
> + status_printf_ln(s, c, _(" (use \"git add/rm <file>...\" as appropriate to mark resolution)"));
There is del/mod conflict and nothing else; the user needs to choose
between add/rm. OK.
> + else if (!simple_deleted_flag && !not_deleted_flag)
> + status_printf_ln(s, c, _(" (use \"git rm <file>...\" as appropriate to mark resolution)"));
Assuming that a closing "}" for the "if (!both_deleted)" above is
missing at the beginning of this line, there is no del/mod conflict,
some del/del and no addition, so "rm" is the only choice, which
makes sense. The same comment on "as appropriate" applies here.
> + else
> + status_printf_ln(s, c, _(" (use \"git add/rm <file>...\" as appropriate to mark resolution)"));
> status_printf_ln(s, c, "");
> }
I like the way it tries to be helpful, but I doubt this patch would
make much difference in the real life. As you follow the logic like
I demonstrated above, you show specific help only in a very narrow
case (i.e. there is no possible removal or there are nothing but
"both sides removed").
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-30 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-24 9:37 [PATCH/RFC] t7512-status-warnings.sh : better advices for git status Kong Lucien
2012-05-24 17:31 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-05-26 12:38 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] wt-status: " Kong Lucien
2012-05-26 12:38 ` [PATCHv2 2/2] t7512-status-warnings.sh: " Kong Lucien
2012-05-27 12:57 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-05-28 8:43 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-05-26 13:01 ` [PATCHv2 1/2] wt-status: " Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2012-05-26 17:17 ` NGUY Thomas
2012-05-27 12:58 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-05-27 13:10 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-05-28 4:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-28 7:05 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-05-30 4:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-28 10:54 ` konglu
2012-05-28 17:36 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] wt-status.*: better advices for git status added Kong Lucien
2012-05-28 17:36 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] t7512-status-warnings.sh: better advices for git status Kong Lucien
2012-05-28 20:36 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] wt-status.*: better advices for git status added Matthieu Moy
2012-05-29 19:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-30 11:09 ` konglu
2012-05-30 17:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-31 6:47 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-05-30 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 1/3] " Kong Lucien
2012-05-30 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 2/3] t7512-status-warnings.sh: better advices for git status Kong Lucien
2012-05-30 13:23 ` [PATCHv4 3/3] Advices about 'git rm' during conflicts (unmerged paths) more relevant Kong Lucien
2012-05-30 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2012-05-30 21:50 ` konglu
2012-05-31 7:06 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-05-31 7:59 ` konglu
2012-05-30 18:26 ` [PATCHv4 1/3] wt-status.*: better advices for git status added Junio C Hamano
2012-05-30 19:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-31 6:42 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-05-31 6:44 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-05-31 6:29 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-05-31 6:34 ` Andrew Ardill
2012-05-31 15:15 ` [PATCHv5 " Kong Lucien
2012-05-31 15:15 ` [PATCHv5 2/3] t7512-status-help.sh: better advices for git status Kong Lucien
2012-05-31 15:15 ` [PATCHv5 3/3] status: don't suggest "git rm" or "git add" if not appropriate Kong Lucien
2012-06-01 8:55 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-06-01 12:15 ` Phil Hord
2012-06-01 14:08 ` konglu
2012-06-01 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-31 21:36 ` [PATCHv5 1/3] wt-status.*: better advices for git status added Junio C Hamano
2012-06-01 9:16 ` konglu
2012-06-01 9:26 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-06-01 14:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-01 16:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-01 19:39 ` konglu
2012-06-01 8:42 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-06-01 11:27 ` konglu
2012-06-01 12:40 ` Phil Hord
2012-06-01 16:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-04 18:00 ` Phil Hord
2012-06-03 18:30 ` [PATCHv6 1/4] " Kong Lucien
2012-06-03 18:30 ` [PATCHv6 2/4] t7512-status-help.sh: better advices for git status Kong Lucien
2012-06-03 21:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-04 10:04 ` konglu
2012-06-04 15:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-04 22:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-03 18:30 ` [PATCHv6 3/4] status: don't suggest "git rm" or "git add" if not appropriate Kong Lucien
2012-06-03 19:34 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-06-03 18:30 ` [PATCHv6 4/4] status: better advices when splitting a commit (during rebase -i) Kong Lucien
2012-06-03 22:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-04 15:35 ` Phil Hord
2012-06-05 9:13 ` konglu
2012-06-03 21:06 ` [PATCHv6 1/4] wt-status.*: better advices for git status added Junio C Hamano
2012-06-04 9:51 ` konglu
2012-06-04 14:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-04 17:19 ` [PATCHv7 " Kong Lucien
2012-06-04 17:19 ` [PATCHv7 2/4] t7512-status-help.sh: better advices for git status Kong Lucien
2012-06-04 21:02 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-06-04 23:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-04 17:19 ` [PATCHv7 3/4] status: don't suggest "git rm" or "git add" if not appropriate Kong Lucien
2012-06-04 17:19 ` [PATCHv7 4/4] status: better advices when splitting a commit (during rebase -i) Kong Lucien
2012-06-04 23:01 ` [PATCHv7 1/4] wt-status.*: better advices for git status added Junio C Hamano
2012-06-05 10:32 ` konglu
2012-06-05 11:33 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-06-05 20:21 ` [PATCHv8 " Lucien Kong
2012-06-05 20:21 ` [PATCHv8 2/4] t7512-status-help.sh: better advices for git status Lucien Kong
2012-06-05 20:21 ` [PATCHv8 3/4] status: don't suggest "git rm" or "git add" if not appropriate Lucien Kong
2012-06-05 20:21 ` [PATCHv8 4/4] status: better advices when splitting a commit (during rebase -i) Lucien Kong
2012-06-05 21:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-08 9:29 ` konglu
2012-06-08 15:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-07 13:17 ` [PATCHv9 1/4] wt-status.*: better advices for git status added Lucien Kong
2012-06-07 13:17 ` [PATCHv9 2/4] t7512-status-help.sh: better advices for git status Lucien Kong
2012-06-07 13:17 ` [PATCHv9 3/4] status: don't suggest "git rm" or "git add" if not appropriate Lucien Kong
2012-06-07 13:17 ` [PATCHv9 4/4] status: better advices when splitting a commit (during rebase -i) Lucien Kong
2012-06-07 18:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-07 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-07 21:05 ` konglu
2012-06-10 11:17 ` [PATCHv10 1/4] wt-status.*: better advices for git status added Lucien Kong
2012-06-10 11:17 ` [PATCHv10 2/4] t7512-status-help.sh: better advices for git status Lucien Kong
2012-06-10 11:17 ` [PATCHv10 3/4] status: don't suggest "git rm" or "git add" if not appropriate Lucien Kong
2012-06-10 11:17 ` [PATCHv10 4/4] status: better advices when splitting a commit (during rebase -i) Lucien Kong
2012-06-11 20:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-06-12 7:14 ` konglu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vipfdzeyu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Franck.Jonas@ensimag.imag.fr \
--cc=Huynh-Khoi-Nguyen.Nguyen@ensimag.imag.fr \
--cc=Lucien.Kong@ensimag.imag.fr \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=Thomas.Nguy@ensimag.imag.fr \
--cc=Valentin.Duperray@ensimag.imag.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).