From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 4/8] gitweb: (gr)avatar support Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:29:13 -0700 Message-ID: <7vhby2o6xy.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1245926587-25074-1-git-send-email-giuseppe.bilotta@gmail.com> <200906270058.16686.jnareb@gmail.com> <200906270125.25048.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Giuseppe Bilotta , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jun 27 02:29:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MKLnH-0002Im-2O for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:29:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753853AbZF0A3N (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:29:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753464AbZF0A3M (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:29:12 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44]:59069 "EHLO fed1rmmtao102.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753339AbZF0A3M (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:29:12 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090627002914.GKAA20976.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:29:14 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.225.240.211]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 8oVE1c0044aMwMQ03oVEAl; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:29:14 -0400 X-VR-Score: -110.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=qedoUCQmkU8A:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=VPW9pYw8AAAA:8 a=smv0LlRKKQCf4SFRNCMA:9 a=gxnVsg9yp5aRhlT4uR-ldy0CvHAA:4 a=fDI1rFJSvNwA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 In-Reply-To: <200906270125.25048.jnareb@gmail.com> (Jakub Narebski's message of "Sat\, 27 Jun 2009 01\:25\:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski writes: > I'm not sure if having picons as 'default' for gravatar is a good idea, > because the rules for resolving picons are complicated[1]... which > I didn't realize when writing this (sketch of) idea. > > [1] http://www.cs.indiana.edu/picons/ftp/faq.html Also picons these days look somewhat antiquated with its rather strict limitation to the colormaps (IIRC, you practically have to go grayscale if you want to use a real photo), and it would make sense to try gravatar first and then fall back to picons.