From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] t/t7004-tag: test handling of rfc1991 signatures Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:19:47 -0800 Message-ID: <7vhbfqjaho.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <4CAB90EC.1080302@drmicha.warpmail.net> <7vwrommn6j.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4CD9839B.6060406@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Stephan Hugel To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 10 01:20:02 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PFyPx-00011M-Rl for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 01:20:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752385Ab0KJAT5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:19:57 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:45926 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752039Ab0KJAT4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:19:56 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657BA3D21; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:20:00 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=YF0Wn7Ck3biH3pSKp8ZUBDkCKWc=; b=CzqS2U 4grTwAA2pIFMcGz4hq8qOOhxu/wbO77kDnv8OQd2GQW4pVh+r6j7K7NqgtPQMKaa B/EEnYhDYIvs3eyOlS/u+nQ+D3CoRhRUONmMAZh+7UVeHAX5VDHyyQOVRJf48utx cYmiEamPg31B0E8HOukPoJQH6Ugel5patgET4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=i+zST5zFmiuBGTN1PgDzWcYu6zZTfb10 5WMcj13Q7tiebQkmBx5Sg/Dqvjo/pUHLdtPC/baT287YYLltlTSg927IwFUM3e6z cQU8pA1/UCBoln2PxyRRdJQuYp4CC5bZExaih/AQ3n0pPTQxWfpHv+1exBsGoolg 3ndPdnvVQPI= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BC23D1B; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:19:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9907E3D14; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:19:52 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4CD9839B.6060406@drmicha.warpmail.net> (Michael J. Gruber's message of "Tue\, 09 Nov 2010 18\:23\:39 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3F8E540A-EC60-11DF-B79B-B53272ABC92C-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael J Gruber writes: > The --rfc1991 option matters for the creation of signatures only, not > for the verification (and neither for display/listing with git, of course). Doesn't the above statement assume a bit too much about how the current version of gpg behaves, I have to wonder?