From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Re: rebase -i: explain how to discard all commits Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:28:03 -0800 Message-ID: <7vfwsnqn8c.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20110120195726.GA11702@burratino> <20110120200827.GB14184@vidovic> <201101202134.41911.trast@student.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nicolas Sebrecht , Jonathan Nieder , Matthieu Moy , , , Kevin Ballard , Yann Dirson , Eric Raible , Johannes Schindelin To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 20 22:29:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pg245-00088C-4v for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:29:09 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755260Ab1ATV2n (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:28:43 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:41226 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754974Ab1ATV2c (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:28:32 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40E23E3F; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:29:16 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=u809stSXSg1kAUhfervMKNIDx3s=; b=F8ytLf 3ETHaTjJ9TTJ2LTZ/QKchJhzSswE6wE6ybE8ohP+eolZou9/Bacf2aQQcrEyCUVR 5tTZajElhHIU20jWstbiU4lLHrNUgpGHGQxhLkL9Hs98+dm2jN5drDc6/bXT2fjb uwT2wVJJPl/9jNn9qa8GHtxFF+evqBuDMd6+I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ow8U3Tbjm+NUO88W1dxi4jPJsyEm+YTJ Cst6bNov56OwiILK0br3pyAtFKOwHVG7woYpu9qvQnDRMSPLqPLpZPpe7wlPbvum 3a695B24CvE39URyqZqf6YneaFnakoLS4O5U4G9iE64qzG2kU2bcTQPtBszkgZg8 +VDUL71gAFQ= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590DB3E3B; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:29:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA42F3E2D; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 16:28:52 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <201101202134.41911.trast@student.ethz.ch> (Thomas Rast's message of "Thu\, 20 Jan 2011 21\:34\:41 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4FEA1A14-24DC-11E0-BFCA-BC4EF3E828EC-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Thomas Rast writes: > (I for one have never accepted such a rebase; if the TODO only > consists of noop, that means I made a mistake.) Wouldn't that suggest us that if we were to do anything to this message it would be a good idea to teach the user to "reset --hard" the branch if no commits truly needs to be replayed on top of the onto-commit?