From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git send-email should not allow 'y' for in-reply-to Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 01:03:44 -0800 Message-ID: <7vfw0m5bin.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1357885869-20815-1-git-send-email-cyliu@suse.com> <50EFD066.60501@redhat.com> <50F0402A.1000108@redhat.com> <20130111164730.GA7921@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20130111185417.GA12852@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Hilco Wijbenga , Eric Blake , libvir-list@redhat.com, Jeff King To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 24 10:04:24 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9XVH-0001az-OQ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:04:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755269Ab3BXJDu (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:03:50 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:60794 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751719Ab3BXJDr (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:03:47 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FFF9BEE; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:03:46 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=sasl; bh=j9WvHtS3c58G+PD0t+rqW8aemZc=; b=e7LrMGVBbD9RSrfXuDrs 0g2pe816Xsjib/5filqfP4fpLlC2kx/35k85dCmX0cKVL2W6E6tn3C8LhYksk6PU iYZysyoUr5XW4I6NxqZAPOFQd0jfoJh09LUCZ+uPbZA+a7WG6aKRifK4cLChEX4w RM4rZFoQLdqQl1uVPaJgJUA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=K2slrVI3891igk36+gGudXsCV5cIHup5TdNanSpUqTDc1j 3Ii7q6LdZZuwJ36Ki51kJrNeLuOVQ3I+0HV8qVueDcV7TB6m9Vacb5tctAdDtIiw 1GBO3LAJ8MefZWpg7DADDRtOPzKntgqF0vjHu0oY6jZNBpQXneDm2KLteWfyE= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64FA9BED; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:03:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C9819BE9; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:03:46 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 18770282-7E61-11E2-8F56-27D12E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:43:39AM -0800, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > ... > More seriously, I agree that re-wording the question is a reasonable > thing to do. I do not use send-email, either, so I don't have a strong > opinion on it. The suggestions you made: > >> How about "What Message-ID to use as In-Reply-To for the first email?" >> or "Provide the Message-ID to use as In-Reply-To for the first >> email:". > > seem fine to me. Maybe somebody who has been confused by it can offer > more. At any rate, patches welcome. Has anything come out of this discussion? Is the current phrasing fine as-is?