From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Can't find the revelant commit with git-log Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:24:17 -0800 Message-ID: <7vei7zjr3y.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <4D3EF650.20407@lsrfire.ath.cx> <4D3FFB0F.9070700@viscovery.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sverre Rabbelier , Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org, =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe To: Francis Moreau X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 26 22:24:43 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PiCr4-0000HI-If for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 22:24:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754028Ab1AZVYg (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:24:36 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:57981 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753487Ab1AZVYg (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:24:36 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 936183AAD; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:25:20 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=M9aTU9La/56875iM4TydElVFJGo=; b=X+aipY 5MDzAX0hjlqsOhxg2cca01tPEcuoOmt4kHgMOAUUJJMaJgeY0kHpQZu83NYiFAyI Yt3rI+GSgrKjpiQJKkRBKrFFQycPj1kaGb5WYp1TvAw+ZGYb8KKXma04H/4dKeSK SYdmIV010y8q7rzI8K/flupkQ1h3yjoJqzn8s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=rgeDLXRePl3NcHIp5tN1y5qMFZgb2vLN sPOExBcAzOsttXGeb00LC7CfIjMpHOMMyOKIvU1bDJkLU+ZpzzbZpKqBRCxVoc2s 2qO0VpyJXePNVr/ZGqWubfQlSabH2Px9Nklmol3CqG3P/u29r1O5UUqb+SwtvE9z obcX8kbPwTY= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368033AA9; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:25:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 986733AA7; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:25:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Francis Moreau's message of "Wed\, 26 Jan 2011 22\:08\:26 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C4063A80-2992-11E0-9D23-BC4EF3E828EC-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Francis Moreau writes: >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 21:56, Francis Moreau wrote: >>> Just out of curiosity, I'd like to know why, since it has no annoyance >>> for those who are replying to my emails. >> >> We keep everybody on CC who's interested in the thread here, and >> usually reply directly to the person whose email we respond to. In >> this case, I had to manually edit the TO line to be just you, and move >> everybody else to the CC. > > Well, if I decided to set Mail-Followup-To, that do mean that I don't > want you to do that ! That is _not_ something for _you_ to unilaterally decide. I am responding to _you_ with this message to tell _you_ something, while keeping Sverre, J6t and Rene and the list in the loop. If I followedyour M-F-T on the message I am responding to, I would have ended up placing these "secondary" (for the purpose of my message) on my "To:" line. That would make it impossible for them to prioritize the messages addressed directly to them (which would have their address on "To:") over other messages that they are merely in the loop (which would not have them on "To:"---their address may be on "Cc:" or they may be getting the message from the list). So please don't. Thanks.