From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2013, #07; Thu, 20) Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 11:26:19 -0700 Message-ID: <7vehbvmib8.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7v1u7woydw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vk3lno40x.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vtxkrmlz5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Ramkumar Ramachandra X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jun 21 20:26:28 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uq62V-0002hQ-Nc for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 20:26:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1945929Ab3FUS0Y (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:26:24 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:38555 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945926Ab3FUS0W (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:26:22 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDFD2A711; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:26:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=BV0NdGMhIJv8SKZ7wFwaOxi0+wk=; b=nHCspo povuiNmTT3sO+YeOEphS7zoEjCOlewiFMePqMmWBUGjyKSs0MOi6jqnMGk07g8Vw Mlj8vg3XkMNqKIKrGuvgAFj+92/ptak+x5xgigrQexmunXTaAq82P8nVdLJWBLAQ dag/o9E6jROG0rHvcuB3BMiGniYxaATaPjhh0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=akyPWgZQ6W3sIRvt4+v0K9pmHsQ/bbxR xz5CsSqtPQS0Z9l1FdirUhxiNwsNEPq0wT986MZuowdO78qx/ibDJbTz4Z0q7SVi ROMb/OLnqb9jK3pB8WAKmch3f7EV66sHazgSib1hVfTTReTLmCzhIEQIUGGCOtyk yOhcQiZPKgY= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DE12A710; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:26:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [50.161.4.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2EC2C2A70F; Fri, 21 Jun 2013 18:26:21 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Ramkumar Ramachandra's message of "Fri, 21 Jun 2013 22:43:20 +0530") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 12593AFA-DAA0-11E2-96B9-80EC6777888E-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ramkumar Ramachandra writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >>> ... I've noticed a significant decline in >>> list-reviews in general: a lot of good code on the list hasn't been >>> reviewed. >> >> Hmph, I do not particularly see that happening. > > Observer bias. To verify either claim, could you run some stats on > the ML archives [1] and report the results? Unfortunately, I tend to become bottleneck more often than you do, so I do not think that would be a good use of my time. Which ones went unreviewed that are of high value?