From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sh updates for 2.6.25 Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:25:28 -0700 Message-ID: <7vd4oqwkev.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080415172333.GA29489@linux-sh.org> <20080416003725.GF8387@genesis.frugalware.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jakub Narebski , Linus Torvalds , Git Mailing List To: Miklos Vajna X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 16 06:39:52 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlyI3-0003tr-9F for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Apr 2008 05:26:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755418AbYDPDZp (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:25:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755410AbYDPDZp (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:25:45 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:34371 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755339AbYDPDZo (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:25:44 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E926D2F96; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:25:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1FA2F95; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:25:36 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080416003725.GF8387@genesis.frugalware.org> (Miklos Vajna's message of "Wed, 16 Apr 2008 02:37:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Miklos Vajna writes: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 11:43:24AM -0700, Jakub Narebski wrote: >> I seem to remember (but I might be mistaken) that this issue was >> corrected by some patch on git mailing list already... > > If we are at it, I had a similar bugreport: If one doesn't use an empty > line after the first line in the commit message, a git-format-patch + > git-am combo will strip newlines from the commit message: That's not a bug but an intended behaviour. You are triggering "RFC 2822 line folding" of Subject: header.