From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-rebase--interactive.sh: Add new command "shell" Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:31:09 -0800 Message-ID: <7vd3qfr7ki.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <9C0BAFB4-299E-459B-A64A-54D480C5445D@sb.org> <20101104112530.5c0e444a@chalon.bertin.fr> <4CD2E7B4.3000908@nextest.com> <20101104181020.GB16431@burratino> <20101104205307.GA8911@home.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Matthieu Moy , Eric Raible , Yann Dirson , kevin@sb.org, git@vger.kernel.org To: Yann Dirson X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 08 19:31:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PFWVF-00057M-6t for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:31:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754798Ab0KHSbc (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:31:32 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:49402 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752720Ab0KHSbb (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:31:31 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44AE42FE9; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:31:30 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=znmKOsmDFgBjFyHBWwwLt/tPRvE=; b=nCoy1d aqs+XWQJP9l43pvCkGuywVVLauIo2o0auHnVPRurIURgwwQ3I0a8eRbnGSBI/e/f 9IlEtJqP66kGmT2fIAK2aLhS7kXovnGfvviH7sYy2R4r/3DhiWepRBwcvZI36QTr RgrwaPfTjcO4SOiSDfywVqAvJDnO209+ckXYg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=bzJVmUgMe1Gxf8gJa7GCa827bZWhbUg1 wZ6UMSTM1ie5zbJ3eOxPZqzc4wLFztqDhOniFe8+KbKiwSHtwbjzwiTb9dxSRMqd ZxaSPmIUbmmhN0OzzOHL35IUkdAcg0L9Y2OzZ+Z38nREvJbbHR1WuP5GZ+PI6Oh0 qY78N89vTa8= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1D82FE2; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:31:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3AE92FE0; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 13:31:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20101104205307.GA8911@home.lan> (Yann Dirson's message of "Thu\, 4 Nov 2010 21\:53\:08 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6334E702-EB66-11DF-B9EE-B53272ABC92C-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Yann Dirson writes: > # e, edit = use commit (if specified) but pause to amend/examine/test When an end user is given pick one pick two pick three ... and told the above, would it be crystal clear that, if he changed the insn sheet to pick one edit pick three ... then he will _lose_ the change made by foo, or will the user come back here and complain that a precious change "two" is lost and it is git's fault?