From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-daemon on NSLU2 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 15:59:32 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbqcwcze3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <9e4733910708232254w4e74ca72o917c7cadae4ee0f4@mail.gmail.com> <20070824062106.GV27913@spearce.org> <9e4733910708241238n1899f332j4fafbd6d7ccc48b9@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910708241417l44c55306xaa322afda69c6beb@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910708241506h6eecc11ge41b1dc313022b4b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Aug 25 00:59:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IOi7y-0008Nz-5O for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:59:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758769AbXHXW7h (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:59:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761234AbXHXW7h (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:59:37 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:34015 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756375AbXHXW7g (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:59:36 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62B712779A; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 18:59:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Jakub Narebski's message of "Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:39:16 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski writes: > There was idea to special case clone (just concatenate the packs, the > receiving side as someone told there can detect pack boundaries; do not > forget to pack loose objects, first), instead of using generic fetch --all > for clone, bnut no code. Code speaks louder than words (although if someone > would provide details of pack boundary detection...) I have to say that "although ..." part of that statement disqualifies this to be called an "idea". Really, I find that you (yes, in this case I am not generalizing but talking specifically about you) tend to overuse the word "idea" when you talk things that are not yet even at that stage yet.