From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: How to create the " [PATCH 0/5]" first email? Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:47:36 -0700 Message-ID: <7vboh3m7tz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1347710524-15404-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> <7vzk4rz00y.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <98180D4AA94C468887029389CC535D4F@PhilipOakley> <7vfw6gqkfg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20120918001522.GA10283@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7v7grsqi98.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20120918185530.GB20498@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vsjafm9hd.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20120918191653.GA21187@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Philip Oakley , Git List To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 18 21:47:49 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TE3ls-00080Q-V2 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:47:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754608Ab2IRTrk (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:47:40 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:46433 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754551Ab2IRTrj (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:47:39 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151AD9E95; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:47:39 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=y4ebvZgjQNblpbcjI+y5mHrjdQo=; b=mpX6lU agTgkfdGd0jaV14OL5WxxB8mppW7Tgx4XKrj/clLVMSvhKhyNvpQLNJMHFqDJjGN ezxHTjGSQc7chjFZ8lSCOt23BT+RsaHHi3muDKfZn+Wd8GrBvfG0dKHKMInQFzgo QpyPmHShEAE8/j/OG3hBCVnRs283M8nTC78Og= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=dlCEL8dymZ2SAtUVqeKWwOkPHCFYvX1i ZJyRV/LS1V8c6US1JLr4k0VhnPIhipHfV64WMfTtvHO798YAV9Y8JOqAomA0jhoc 9yBJgnqaYjas1McpsOZELNTc9aAU/QWC1HywiokZyvjHzM6FO8rYt/C/jGcCf/9i /BTYDgPigTI= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031B09E94; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:47:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 404E39E93; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:47:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20120918191653.GA21187@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:16:53 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B34C39F4-01C9-11E2-925E-18772E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:11:58PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Jeff King writes: >> >> > But even without that, I still think format-patch is a reasonable time >> > to do it. It is the time when I proof-read my commit message and patch >> > in its final form, and think "do I really want to send this?". >> >> But it is not like "I cannot sign off because I think it is still >> iffy". > > No, that is not the particular reason in my case, but I think I > explained other reasons why "format-patch -s" is not a wrong workflow. Then I didn't read it. What does "do I really want to send this?" have anything to do with DCO in any case?