From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Write index file on any checkout of files Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:44:50 -0800 Message-ID: <7vablkhi25.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <87wsop188j.fsf@wine.dyndns.org> <7vfxvcj0b7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Julliard To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 28 22:45:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JUqZU-0008MQ-1X for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 22:45:44 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751609AbYB1VpI (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:45:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751637AbYB1VpI (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:45:08 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:65069 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751609AbYB1VpH (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:45:07 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07801900; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:45:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB06189F; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:44:59 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Barkalow's message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:21:33 -0500 (EST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Daniel Barkalow writes: > Yeah, that's a better organization, and makes the code nice. Want it as a > replacement patch or as an additional patch on top of this one? Thanks. Replacement would be nice, as I do look at patches during my lunchtime but not apply them until evening, on my day-job days.