From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: snapshot cleanups & support for offering multiple formats Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 02:06:09 -0700 Message-ID: <7v8x9r2rjy.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <1183053733.6108.0.camel@mattlaptop2> <7vir8w6inf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Matt McCutchen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 08 11:06:44 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I7Sj0-0001ah-EN for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:06:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753246AbXGHJGM (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2007 05:06:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753228AbXGHJGM (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2007 05:06:12 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao104.cox.net ([68.230.241.42]:51859 "EHLO fed1rmmtao104.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753155AbXGHJGK (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Jul 2007 05:06:10 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070708090610.DCVJ1257.fed1rmmtao104.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Sun, 8 Jul 2007 05:06:10 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Lx691X0061kojtg0000000; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 05:06:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7vir8w6inf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sat, 07 Jul 2007 13:52:36 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > This however will break people's existing gitweb configuration, > so if we were to do this it should be post 1.5.3, I would say. We have swallowed some changes that breaks details of user experience so far, and compared to one of them, the incompatibility this brings in is much more benign. We haven't declared -rc1 when the command set and features for the next release is cast in stone. I am tempted to change my mind and am inclined to apply this.