git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix read-tree storing wrong tree reference with modified index
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:45:28 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v630po53r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7vvd8po804.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> writes:
>
>>  	 * The same holds true if we are switching between two trees
>> -	 * using read-tree -m A B.  The index must match B after that.
>> +	 * using read-tree A B (without -m). The index must match B
>> +	 * after that. With given -m it can be a mix of the old index
>> +	 * and the read one.
>
> I think the justification of the original patch is completely bogus.  Why
> not just drop the priming instead?  Two-tree read-tree without -m does not
> make much sense but the result would look like an overlay of two trees,
> and is not likely to match either of the trees.

IOW, how about doing this (backported to 1.6.4 codebase) instead?

-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] Fix "read-tree -m A B" priming the cache-tree

In 456156d a shortcut to priming the index tree reference was
introduced, but the justification for it was completely bogus.

"read-tree -m A B" is to take the index (and the working tree)
that is largely based on (but does not have to match exactly) A
and update it to B, while carrying the local change that does
not overlap the difference between A and B, so there is no reason
to expect that the resulting index should match the tree B.

Noticed and test provided by Heiko Voigt.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
---
 builtin-read-tree.c         |    5 -----
 t/t1001-read-tree-m-2way.sh |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin-read-tree.c b/builtin-read-tree.c
index 82e25ea..4fbf5f8 100644
--- a/builtin-read-tree.c
+++ b/builtin-read-tree.c
@@ -199,14 +199,9 @@ int cmd_read_tree(int argc, const char **argv, const char *unused_prefix)
 	 * "-m ent" or "--reset ent" form), we can obtain a fully
 	 * valid cache-tree because the index must match exactly
 	 * what came from the tree.
-	 *
-	 * The same holds true if we are switching between two trees
-	 * using read-tree -m A B.  The index must match B after that.
 	 */
 	if (nr_trees == 1 && !opts.prefix)
 		prime_cache_tree(&active_cache_tree, trees[0]);
-	else if (nr_trees == 2 && opts.merge)
-		prime_cache_tree(&active_cache_tree, trees[1]);
 
 	if (write_cache(newfd, active_cache, active_nr) ||
 	    commit_locked_index(&lock_file))
diff --git a/t/t1001-read-tree-m-2way.sh b/t/t1001-read-tree-m-2way.sh
index 271bc4e..6e3b601 100755
--- a/t/t1001-read-tree-m-2way.sh
+++ b/t/t1001-read-tree-m-2way.sh
@@ -392,4 +392,20 @@ test_expect_success \
      git ls-files --stage | tee >treeMcheck.out &&
      test_cmp treeM.out treeMcheck.out'
 
+test_expect_success '-m references the correct modified tree' '
+	echo >file-a &&
+	echo >file-b &&
+	git add file-a file-b &&
+	git commit -a -m "test for correct modified tree"
+	git branch initial-mod &&
+	echo b >file-b &&
+	git commit -a -m "B" &&
+	echo a >file-a &&
+	git add file-a &&
+	git ls-tree $(git write-tree) file-a >expect &&
+	git read-tree -m HEAD initial-mod &&
+	git ls-tree $(git write-tree) file-a >actual &&
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
 test_done
-- 
1.7.2.rc2.191.gd2de1

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-09  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-08 22:46 [PATCH] fix read-tree storing wrong tree reference with modified index Heiko Voigt
2010-07-08 23:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2010-07-09  0:45   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2010-07-09 10:04     ` Heiko Voigt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7v630po53r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hvoigt@hvoigt.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).