From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-email: Refuse to send cover-letter template subject Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 12:00:30 -0700 Message-ID: <7v4oupmdv5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7fedc4b76fed03e4db6a2bb7453609c9cd02928a.1244496564.git.trast@student.ethz.ch> <7v4ouqwa42.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <200906092025.18643.markus.heidelberg@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Thomas Rast , git@vger.kernel.org To: markus.heidelberg@web.de X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 09 21:00:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ME6Yp-000193-Ga for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:00:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753885AbZFITAb (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:00:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752356AbZFITAa (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:00:30 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:54468 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752001AbZFITA3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:00:29 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090609190031.ZIIW20430.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:00:31 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.225.240.211]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 1v0X1c0084aMwMQ04v0XuR; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:00:31 -0400 X-VR-Score: -100.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=fC4PegqPu0EA:10 a=rURELfc3W64A:10 a=icSiC9i23aQzfIDuuFsA:9 a=2PI6k7mUX7JmM_GIMTcA:7 a=YCCbR988qUgH_eJSZeKwQyakN6wA:4 a=5KVauyKsRKMA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 In-Reply-To: <200906092025.18643.markus.heidelberg@web.de> (Markus Heidelberg's message of "Tue\, 9 Jun 2009 20\:25\:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Markus Heidelberg writes: >> Good ;-). More valuable to detect would be an empty "blurb" section >> (i.e. not "unedited *** BLURB HERE ***" string, but literally, there is >> nothing said in the message other than the shortstat). > > My mail "[PATCH 0/6] fixes for git-send-email" had an empty blurb > section because it didn't need any additional description. > I wouldn't want git to refuse sending it. I actually wouldn't have wanted to see that [0/6] with empty description. If the list of 6 patch titles give clear enough description of the theme of the whole series, you would not need [0/6] to set the stage, and that is the best kind of series. For your send-email patches, you certainly chose very good titles for them.