git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] rerere forget path: forget recorded resolution
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 17:58:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v4omte72j.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vpr5krxoo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Fri\, 08 Jan 2010 15\:20\:23 -0800")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> writes:
>
>> Your implementation forgets to re-insert the forgotten resolutions into
>> MERGE_RR, therefore, the next 'git rerere' does not record the new
>> resolution.
>>
>> In my implementation of 'rerere forget', I had the following tests.
>
> Please filfre to roll a patch that adds the tests and code that inserts
> necessary MERGE_RR entries, if the feature is pressing; unfortunately I
> don't think I will have much git time during the coming weekend.

I ended up doing this myself.  As we are dropping the postimage and adding
a new MERGE_RR entry, I also think that it is safer to update the preimage
with the conflict we got for this round, so I added that as well.

However, I think there is a room for improvement in preimage handling.

Currently, the rerere database is indexed with the conflict hash and for
each conflict hash you can record a single preimage-postimage pair to
replay.  But you can have conflicts with the same conflict hash, but with
slightly different contexts outside the conflicted region, and the right
resolution can be different depending on the outside context.

In the traditional implementation, I punted this issue by noticing
conflicts in the three-way merge between pre, post and this images.  If
preimage is too different from the conflicted contents we got during this
merge, then the previous resolution should not apply.

But I think the right solution would be to have more than one preimage and
postimage pairs (preimage.0 vs postimage.0,... etc.) and try to use each
of them in handle_path() until it finds one that can be used to cleanly
merge with the conflict we got in thisimage during this round.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-11  1:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-21 18:58 [PATCH/RFC 0/3] git rerere unresolve file Johannes Sixt
2009-11-21 19:00 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/3] rerere: keep a list of resolved files in MERGE_RR Johannes Sixt
2009-11-21 19:01   ` [PATCH/RFC 2/3] rerere: make recording of the preimage reusable Johannes Sixt
2009-11-21 19:02     ` [PATCH/RFC 3/3] git rerere unresolve file Johannes Sixt
2009-11-22  2:53 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/3] " Junio C Hamano
2009-11-22 14:19   ` Johannes Sixt
2009-11-24 23:40     ` Nanako Shiraishi
2009-12-29 21:42   ` [PATCH 0/9] Undoing conflict resolution Junio C Hamano
2009-12-29 21:42     ` [PATCH 1/9] builtin-merge.c: use standard active_cache macros Junio C Hamano
2009-12-29 21:42     ` [PATCH 2/9] resolve-undo: record resolved conflicts in a new index extension section Junio C Hamano
2009-12-29 21:42     ` [PATCH 3/9] resolve-undo: basic tests Junio C Hamano
2009-12-29 21:42     ` [PATCH 4/9] resolve-undo: allow plumbing to clear the information Junio C Hamano
2009-12-29 21:42     ` [PATCH 5/9] resolve-undo: "checkout -m path" uses resolve-undo information Junio C Hamano
2009-12-29 21:42     ` [PATCH 6/9] resolve-undo: teach "update-index --unresolve" to use resolve-undo info Junio C Hamano
2009-12-29 21:42     ` [PATCH 7/9] rerere: remove silly 1024-byte line limit Junio C Hamano
2009-12-29 21:42     ` [PATCH 8/9] rerere: refactor rerere logic to make it independent from I/O Junio C Hamano
2009-12-29 21:42     ` [PATCH 9/9] rerere forget path: forget recorded resolution Junio C Hamano
2010-01-05 21:25       ` Johannes Sixt
2010-01-06  1:06         ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-06  8:55           ` Johannes Sixt
2010-01-06 16:58             ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-06 21:59               ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-08 21:55       ` Johannes Sixt
2010-01-08 23:20         ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-11  1:58           ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2010-01-11 19:22             ` Johannes Sixt
2010-01-11 20:05               ` Junio C Hamano
2010-01-11 21:05                 ` Johannes Sixt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7v4omte72j.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).