From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add ALL_LDFLAGS to the git target. Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:25:58 -0800 Message-ID: <7v1wwnnyvt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7v64lzo1j7.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <13226.1143508524@lotus.CS.Berkeley.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 28 03:26:11 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FO2yD-0002qr-B7 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:26:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751187AbWC1B0B (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:26:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751193AbWC1B0A (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:26:00 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:20934 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751187AbWC1B0A (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:26:00 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060328012559.PLLI17006.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:25:59 -0500 To: Jason Riedy In-Reply-To: <13226.1143508524@lotus.CS.Berkeley.EDU> (Jason Riedy's message of "Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:15:24 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jason Riedy writes: > For some reason, I need ALL_LDFLAGS in the git target only on > AIX. I wonder what the dependency is, since ALL_LDFLAGS is not modified on AIX, but you are right. That is the only binary that does not link with ALL_LDFLAGS which can include whatever user passes via LDFLAGS. > Once it builds, only one test "fails" on AIX 5.1 with > 1.3.0.rc1, t5500-fetch-pack.sh, but it looks like it's some > odd tool problem in the tester + my setup and not a real bug. Curious and would appreciate more details.