From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: revise top of git man page
Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 21:21:48 -0700
Message-ID: <7v1wwfi90j.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
References: <20060402215434.GA22707@fieldses.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 03 06:22:02 2006
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1FQGZh-0007rC-TT
	for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 03 Apr 2006 06:21:58 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1750815AbWDCEVw (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git@m.gmane.org>);
	Mon, 3 Apr 2006 00:21:52 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750859AbWDCEVw
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Mon, 3 Apr 2006 00:21:52 -0400
Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.241.34]:55532 "EHLO
	fed1rmmtao05.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750815AbWDCEVv (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 3 Apr 2006 00:21:51 -0400
Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127])
          by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
          id <20060403042151.ENI17838.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>;
          Mon, 3 Apr 2006 00:21:51 -0400
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/18310>

"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> writes:

> I'm afraid I'll be accused of trying to suck all the jokes and the
> personality out of the git documentation.  I'm not!  Really!
>
> That said, "man git" is one of the first things a new user is likely try,
> and it seems a little cruel to start off with a somewhat obscure joke
> about the architecture of git.

Sounds sane.  Thanks.