From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] gitweb: Support for arbitrary diffs
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 19:10:10 -0700
Message-ID: <7v1wdgo5x9.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org>
References: <11887443682216-git-send-email-mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
	<fbfjtl$7gh$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070903013330.GR1219@pasky.or.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
To: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 03 04:10:28 2007
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IS1OV-00071R-8f
	for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 04:10:27 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753752AbXICCKR (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git@m.gmane.org>);
	Sun, 2 Sep 2007 22:10:17 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753418AbXICCKR
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Sun, 2 Sep 2007 22:10:17 -0400
Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:44333 "EHLO
	sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753204AbXICCKP (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 2 Sep 2007 22:10:15 -0400
Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C772512D612;
	Sun,  2 Sep 2007 22:10:33 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <20070903013330.GR1219@pasky.or.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of
	"Mon, 3 Sep 2007 03:33:30 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/57425>

Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz> writes:

> To hijack this post a bit, another patch in the queue (the incremental
> blame thingie) introduces blame.js. Do you think that we should keep the
> .js files separate, or instead have one big gitweb.js with everything?
> I'm inclined to the second possibility in order to reduce the number of
> requests, but it comes at a price of slightly worse maintainability.

Is it a possibility to concatenate them at the installation
time, if a single huge file becomes a problem?