git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Cc: "Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	"Grégoire Barbier" <devel@gbarbier.org>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] http-push: making HTTP push more robust and more user-friendly
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:05:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v1w8aygvm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.1.00.0801211539320.13593@iabervon.org> (Daniel Barkalow's message of "Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:30:40 -0500 (EST)")

Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> writes:

> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>> 
>> > IMHO it is safer to disable it for curl < 7.0xa -- even if it affects a 
>> > number of distros -- than to give the illusion that it works, when it does 
>> > not.
>> >
>> > As for fixing it in the non-MULTI case, I have a hunch that Mike's 
>> > cleanups will help that, but that this is a 1.5.5 feature.
>> >
>> > So, I would like to read in the ReleaseNotes something like this:
>> >
>> > -- snip --
>> > Support for pushing via HTTP was broken with curl versions prior to 7.16, 
>> > so we disabled it for now.  However, it is likely that a major cleanup of 
>> > the http transport code -- scheduled after the release of git 1.5.4 -- 
>> > will be supported with more curl versions.
>> > -- snap --
>> 
>> That's tempting but I suspect that it might be a wrong approach.
>> 
>> I think two important questions are:
>> 
>>  * Do we know that the current code is broken for everybody, or
>>    just broken for the majority of people who do nontrivial
>>    things?
>> 
>>  * Is the code in 1.5.3.8 any better?  IOW, did we make it worse
>>    during 1.5.4 cycle?
>
> I believe that the move to transport.c didn't change anything except 
> cleaning up linking conflicts and moving the dispatch by URL method code. 
> I suppose something could have gotten messed up in dealing with the 
> linking conflicts, but I don't think it actually did.

Ok, so copying 1.5.3.8 http-push to include in 1.5.4 would not
make it work, it sounds like.  Then I guess Dscho's notice (and
the same notice with disabling http-push without MULTI in
1.5.3.9) would be the sane thing we should do in the short term.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-21 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-13 19:02 [PATCH] http-push: making HTTP push more robust and more user-friendly Grégoire Barbier
2008-01-13 19:02 ` [PATCH] http-push: fix webdav lock leak Grégoire Barbier
2008-01-13 19:02   ` [PATCH] http-push: disable http-push without USE_CURL_MULTI Grégoire Barbier
2008-01-13 23:01 ` [PATCH] http-push: making HTTP push more robust and more user-friendly Junio C Hamano
2008-01-14 11:21   ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-14 19:35     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-14 20:22       ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-19 15:21   ` Grégoire Barbier
2008-01-19 23:18     ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-21 10:09   ` Grégoire Barbier
2008-01-21 10:20     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-21 10:27       ` Grégoire Barbier
2008-01-21 11:06         ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-21 12:17           ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-21 20:18             ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-21 20:29               ` Mike Hommey
2008-01-22  0:58                 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-22  1:34                   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-22  1:38                     ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-22  2:04                       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-01-22  2:14                         ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-01-21 21:30               ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-01-21 22:05                 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-01-21 23:12                   ` Grégoire Barbier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7v1w8aygvm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
    --cc=devel@gbarbier.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).