From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Docs gitk: Explicitly mention -d, --date-order option Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 23:58:22 -0700 Message-ID: <7v1w52ib5d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1f748ec60804180616i311571eftbabcd3133ff83302@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Git Mailing List" To: "Clifford Caoile" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 19 17:44:53 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jn72c-0007gX-9j for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:59:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752492AbYDSG6d (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:58:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752425AbYDSG6d (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:58:33 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:45453 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752445AbYDSG6c (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:58:32 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8BC2509; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:58:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC4572506; Sat, 19 Apr 2008 02:58:25 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Clifford Caoile" writes: > Git Mailing List, Git Maintainer: Heh, my name is not "Git Maintainer" ;-) > Regarding the documentation patch "[PATCH] Docs gitk: Explicitly > mention -d, --date-order option" [1] (2008-04-12), it has not been > accepted. Is there problem with this patch? > > References: > [1] http://marc.info/?l=git&m=120799377618677&w=2 There isn't anything _wrong_ with the patch per se, but the current documentation refers you to rev-list page and limits itself to the most often used options. I was waiting to see that many people jumping up and down saying that the omission of --date-order from the "most often used" set was a grave bug before applying it. It hasn't happened.