Re: --no-tags doesn't appear to be working as intended

["Ben Denhartog" <ben@sudoforge.com>]

Gah, sorry for the erroneous bug report, this was user error.

This was caused by having `fetch.prunetags = true` in my user-scoped conffile. As per the documentation from `git-fetch`:

```
The --prune-tags option is equivalent to having refs/tags/*:refs/tags/* declared in the refspecs of the remote. This can lead to some seemingly strange interactions:

           # These both fetch tags
           $ git fetch --no-tags origin 'refs/tags/*:refs/tags/*'
           $ git fetch --no-tags --prune-tags origin

       The reason it doesn’t error out when provided without --prune or its config versions is for flexibility of the configured versions, and to maintain a 1=1 mapping between what the command line flags
       do, and what the configuration versions do.
```

-- 
  Ben Denhartog
  ben@sudoforge.com

On Sat, May 2, 2020, at 23:54, Jeff King wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 02:01:35PM -0700, Ben Denhartog wrote:
> 
> > # set up the fork
> > git -C /tmp/b init
> > git -C /tmp/b remote add -f --no-tags upstream file:///tmp/a
> > ```
> > 
> > You'll see the 0.0.1 tag being fetched. You can delete it all you
> > want, set the `remote.upstream.tagopt = --no-tags`, etc -- it will
> > always be pulled. This is the opposite behavior I would expect based
> > on the available documentation and discussion around the tag in the
> > mailing list.
> 
> I don't see that behavior. I get:
> 
>   $ git -C /tmp/b remote add -f --no-tags upstream file:///tmp/a
>   Updating upstream
>   remote: Enumerating objects: 3, done.
>   remote: Counting objects: 100% (3/3), done.
>   remote: Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
>   Unpacking objects: 100% (3/3), 197 bytes | 197.00 KiB/s, done.
>   From file:///tmp/a
>    * [new branch]      master     -> upstream/master
> 
> Is it possible you have some other config that might be conflicting
> (e.g., extra refspecs that ask to transfer tags)? What does "git config
> --list --show-origin" say?
> 
> -Peff
>