From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8E61F59D for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 21:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=gmx.net header.i=@gmx.net header.b="CR7Xdf+c"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234549AbiHLVA5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:00:57 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51316 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234227AbiHLVA4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Aug 2022 17:00:56 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 416BD99255 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 14:00:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1660338045; bh=7MUV7qCU0hkj785QE8KIS6EIZZxZoA/qflsbwq6ONxs=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=CR7Xdf+c0pEpCV5Zzc7C+zrUZ4nnVWoabjO91Hgy3Zugm2m6UeqMrLPWLM5am8UP1 tXcAiC8FdsrbKhfL9eDgCbPIF50pysg8jJ6bVSSdPCrwIBz4eX1AMW4NrZRHcMRTBd de2A+q0apiWMgzRAiFACwFLgWTdXQRhyO78RPj6o= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [172.25.191.7] ([89.1.214.151]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1Mf0BM-1nkUnH2j86-00gUaT; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 23:00:45 +0200 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 23:00:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Johannes Schindelin To: Junio C Hamano cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: fix incorrect --write-junit-xml code In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <78npn9qp-2263-sosp-8901-4484s4499q99@tzk.qr> References: <3qn5r283-3232-4s58-8q9s-n67o407nr816@tzk.qr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:MsQQ5B+fWCJ+P5xfrUoYFXzl9QTB2aPC9gRDWyLOV0wlSEfTzLA 2xaj6CjUKPAiQk6lkibtsaW1Jn45rcoCDdkCcXlcn6Wcclp77g4/cx9+QbnwFuTbelFNmpt KyV0oxXx7jXwePdC2dD5ltifln9fD2CIc7wglkL6GAdaurDbavuzDaBWPO1y36lyh2tyEzs EVQPDBPfqETc638uAxbwQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:t42s6r3lQO0=:XtIHUsWyo8yPELiEA8j22r kMhEatYXs7whFSTUuCR0OykCDQYVAS807JG6iRZwPreHCDZMtLixk9/jucw9N3RRQvh/AOmmL 4cTky9Xh8dUNY471lUY/GIeSkOs7dMDwIpffld9gTLI42oGNVL0knrfAep8exk6k3wDx6jyet Rmos7/b3UIi6fYjhRZlu6DUzI8x2PQnj2xuYR6Jdew/++BgLN/+7uO0ZNVxWVY16g2QWHewDt B8dcRarAbuQdU3wHG6e2qyErKToh+UOJiWoOirzUfhXpeFHYtKJgu6987yhPG/dNYt0VmKd6j t0Xum/eVUbEPMw0DkdWFjVYf5EsRmXpmAsMT/nZSX01myr+apcctK4u7TpdK7Buk8kqqtBUJI U3jKmQ0AhTeMEYDepQQI4O1rfWyckZC1XgsbE2FateJPQrUv7SPnZUft0E/ZoUmGx4HkVBMDI hkFmW/19Vte+Kxt6REA896E3nXAXChaDthB9xJ86WDq6Jv0GMhsAePvBHAu+9KaZk3zxabsXM R3Uk9HTL3fA9o2WpqUHg2bgZyP2PK60DhocKawEVv2p/9YyhQ6cWG0voOv6EScZPPoPQ4Z7Zi yBasDQKOJfWadKfeH0e+WLxA9PSFT23U1uDrFwaurTBSqFDj9E8tEPvtbW/xJ6zMeM1u6vB4c yJvxwPoHGBUW1A/3/EfpuMpeDMIA0+8dZddnwRxyfJqMUYQdtAfEtc1/FZWD3UPevSvtbSg+B aX3K37nz3mr075CNmU2wO+FrLHjX5Vz/m2i8Zca66V9OXpIIY48zL171S/cxi9kH1Ljmf6Pkp qcfqxAX4L0sD69f/wriw0Je96w2mYp9nUY4wzu0mlHRh6DOyidTlVvs66QtxZnnIlUnTTPYWb CduRIQk55jOSkToc0UGycgVua3bfZTiHHbTdY3tcb53kW4jvJUIf0/GIcUcHCSfOTjxVGmyqP vnQu9JIs7CFFK20aalv1niacGIV0yjYSeo6dBKtNVC6vvfQfqtBrHzFxKHX8/DJJYOl5YT5MO DvGJpcOpH8jx7/ywC/j/9HQmORrGkXy6gkhTAR+wBlUfPB+stIvbdXKoIPL6sKPmaAA9Eqp7W cYSe+Npy3mm0iRMe4TnJY18QIB3soLWSjaCxj/sQnW8HuVHBUeL1GenUw== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi Junio, On Wed, 10 Aug 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin writes: > > > The funny thing is that you're usually simply not picking up patches t= hat > > do not get any reviews, but for these refactorings it is somehow > > different, and I do not understand why it needs to be different. > > Well, I am not sure if encouraging the maintainer to drop patches > that are not reviewed is a good overall direction you would want to > go in. I am not encouraging you to drop high-quality patches that have a clear benefit to the project and/or Git's users. You probably know me better than to assume that I would ever do such a thing. You probably meant this comment tongue-in-cheek, but I cannot really tell. It's about these long patch series that touch everything and their dog and the end result brings no clear benefit to users nor the Git project itself. I can easily imagine how wonderful it would be not to see such patch series ever again. ;-) > But let's try that. Less work for me, less disruption to our tree, > and the world may be quieter and more pleasant ;-) Amen! Ciao, Dscho