From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jay Soffian" Subject: Re: Which freedesktop.org "design flaws" in git are still relevant? Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:40:36 -0500 Message-ID: <76718490802291440x60896c93i26d8d0c2cf5678b2@mail.gmail.com> References: <51419b2c0802291232w166b3100yabd30ba30df6ef1f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Jakub Narebski" , "Elijah Newren" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Daniel Barkalow" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 29 23:41:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JVDv4-0002sG-4r for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:41:34 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759647AbYB2Wki (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:40:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760054AbYB2Wki (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:40:38 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.181]:64903 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759647AbYB2Wkh (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:40:37 -0500 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id v27so5006924wah.23 for ; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:40:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=3DuqP9+10hxUhb0OOnWsb3EgY7c/NBvFlR73ferq0U8=; b=sRlAkB3CZaUVjsBOueq5+c9PsOqqBJvlGv6PPoTTP7/zaVN3Zg6tf2xkovuEbLklgsEA1+q2PHKa4fAfm9MsKU5oxR8zCxTxqGhQZ4nl3+AXx70OVkD6KJ0PXYSH4SrObUkrJNAG/m55/1/ks1oy5l1iIbuUcMsD2RfOcW54rDI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sRgKaM4nOUoRPTugYRT6hlXBK7oJXXPgTV4unanYbrLS60xQBuYqoRO1DCwCKGLJpDOu/Yq3jv4UUSmdEIMhSzKOjgnoF0ogz9FT4j7M4bF701Z3lvNc10PKoLfcBx1iWWRdyHxkKq1P8r0v1fSEIcWpVpL77e8SPzbknv1iDcc= Received: by 10.115.47.1 with SMTP id z1mr283127waj.117.1204324836118; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:40:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.13.5 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:40:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Daniel Barkalow wrote: > I wonder if it would be nice to have per-branch aliases, so that you > could have "git update" do whatever is appropriate to update this > particular branch, whether it be "git pull --no-commit" or "git reset > --hard origin/next && git merge" or "git rebase". Well, you effectively have this via branch.*.{merge,mergeoptions,rebase,remote}. e.g.: To effect fetch + non-committing merge: branch..remote = origin branch..merge = refs/heads/ branch..mergeoptions = --no-commit To effect fetch + rebasing: branch..remote = origin branch..merge = refs/heads/ branch..rebase = true (Not sure if there is a way to get "rebase -m" though...) To effect reset --hard origin/next, add another fetch line to your remote. e.g.: [remote "origin"] url = git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git fetch = +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/* fetch = refs/heads/pu:/refs/heads/pu-readonly Now "git pull" does the right thing whichever branch I'm on. j.