* Mapping old gmane numbers to existing amil servers? @ 2016-08-11 7:01 Philip Oakley 2016-08-11 7:56 ` Eric Wong 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Philip Oakley @ 2016-08-11 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Git List Is there an accessible mapping from the old gmane message numbers to one of the remaining email list servers for the git list? I've seen discussions about the public-inbox, but no mention of any mapping for old message references. -- Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Mapping old gmane numbers to existing amil servers? 2016-08-11 7:01 Mapping old gmane numbers to existing amil servers? Philip Oakley @ 2016-08-11 7:56 ` Eric Wong 2016-08-11 21:00 ` Philip Oakley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Eric Wong @ 2016-08-11 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Oakley; +Cc: git Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org> wrote: > Is there an accessible mapping from the old gmane message numbers to one of > the remaining email list servers for the git list? Yes, I just posted about this after posting an initial mapping a few weeks ago: https://public-inbox.org/git/20160811002819.GA8311@starla/T/#u Using "gmane:$NUM" in the search bar should work, now. (there's a few missing messages which might've been due to off-by-one errors, will fill them in soon) > I've seen discussions about the public-inbox, but no mention of any mapping > for old message references. I had a gzipped text file published originally if you look upthread there. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Mapping old gmane numbers to existing amil servers? 2016-08-11 7:56 ` Eric Wong @ 2016-08-11 21:00 ` Philip Oakley 2016-08-11 22:26 ` Eric Wong 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Philip Oakley @ 2016-08-11 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Wong; +Cc: git From: "Eric Wong" <e@80x24.org> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 8:56 AM > Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org> wrote: >> Is there an accessible mapping from the old gmane message numbers to one >> of >> the remaining email list servers for the git list? > > Yes, I just posted about this after posting an initial mapping > a few weeks ago: > https://public-inbox.org/git/20160811002819.GA8311@starla/T/#u > > Using "gmane:$NUM" in the search bar should work, now. > (there's a few missing messages which might've been due to > off-by-one errors, will fill them in soon) > >> I've seen discussions about the public-inbox, but no mention of any >> mapping >> for old message references. > > I had a gzipped text file published originally if you look > upthread there. > Thanks. The raw download works. My home ISP is currently blocking your email for some reason, though I do see it at my work - my iee.org alias is via my professional body which duplicates the email when it relays it. On thing I did note on the web display of the threads is that it would be good to have a leader of " . . . . . `" so that one can count the level of indent, and see the alignments via the columns of dots. When looking at https://public-inbox.org/git/0648000B273C412AB7140AE959EBC99A%40PhilipOakley/ I had difficulty working out which email the last 4 were replying to. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Mapping old gmane numbers to existing amil servers? 2016-08-11 21:00 ` Philip Oakley @ 2016-08-11 22:26 ` Eric Wong 2016-08-12 7:38 ` Philip Oakley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Eric Wong @ 2016-08-11 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philip Oakley; +Cc: git Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org> wrote: > The raw download works. My home ISP is currently blocking your email for > some reason, though I do see it at my work - my iee.org alias is via my > professional body which duplicates the email when it relays it. Hmm, do other emails from other users get blocked? I wonder if it's lack of DKIM (which gets invalidated by the list sig vger appends) or something else... > On thing I did note on the web display of the threads is that it would be > good to have a leader of " . . . . . `" so that one can count the level of > indent, and see the alignments via the columns of dots. > > When looking at > https://public-inbox.org/git/0648000B273C412AB7140AE959EBC99A%40PhilipOakley/ > I had difficulty working out which email the last 4 were replying to. https://public-inbox.org/git/0648000B273C412AB7140AE959EBC99A%40PhilipOakley/ So, right now, it's: 2016-07-20 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] doc: revisions - clarify reachability examples Philip Oakley 2016-07-20 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-08-11 21:50 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Update git revisions Philip Oakley 2016-08-11 21:50 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] doc: use 'symmetric difference' consistently Philip Oakley 2016-06-25 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-06-27 13:37 ` Philip Oakley 2016-06-27 15:08 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-06-27 15:39 ` Philip Oakley And you would rather see something like: 2016-07-20 21:10 . ` [PATCH v4 8/8] doc: revisions - clarify reachability examples Philip Oakley 2016-07-20 22:22 . ` Junio C Hamano 2016-08-11 21:50 . ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Update git revisions Philip Oakley 2016-08-11 21:50 . ` [PATCH v5 01/12] doc: use 'symmetric difference' consistently Philip Oakley 2016-06-25 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-06-27 13:37 ` Philip Oakley 2016-06-27 15:08 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-06-27 15:39 ` Philip Oakley ? Actually, my initial inclination was to use the '|' character which is what mutt does 2016-07-20 21:10 | } [PATCH v4 8/8] doc: revisions - clarify reachability examples Philip Oakley 2016-07-20 22:22 | } Junio C Hamano 2016-08-11 21:50 | ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Update git revisions Philip Oakley 2016-08-11 21:50 | ` [PATCH v5 01/12] doc: use 'symmetric difference' consistently Philip Oakley 2016-06-25 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-06-27 13:37 ` Philip Oakley 2016-06-27 15:08 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-06-27 15:39 ` Philip Oakley It should be doable, and the '`' immediately following the last '|' probably ought to be a link to the parent, too. I would also like to use '}' (as above) or '+' where mutt would use "├─>" or just '├', but I don't think I can introduce multibyte chars without causing problems for some users. Anyways, it's definitely on my ever-growing todo list. (Wow, it is refreshing to be a "web designer" who can live entirely in a terminal without relying on screenshots :D) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Mapping old gmane numbers to existing amil servers? 2016-08-11 22:26 ` Eric Wong @ 2016-08-12 7:38 ` Philip Oakley 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Philip Oakley @ 2016-08-12 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Wong; +Cc: git From: "Eric Wong" <e@80x24.org> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016 11:26 PM > Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org> wrote: >> The raw download works. My home ISP is currently blocking your email for >> some reason, though I do see it at my work - my iee.org alias is via my >> professional body which duplicates the email when it relays it. > > Hmm, do other emails from other users get blocked? > I wonder if it's lack of DKIM (which gets invalidated by the > list sig vger appends) or something else... Not really sure. My professional body's alias service now uses EveryCloud for its antispam. initially it also blocked your mails as 'spam', by the daily notification allows me to white list that. However the forwarded emails go to both home & work, and only the home ISP (cheap but annoying) then has no white list mechanism and no way of seeing what they binned. > >> On thing I did note on the web display of the threads is that it would be >> good to have a leader of " . . . . . `" so that one can count the level >> of >> indent, and see the alignments via the columns of dots. >> >> When looking at >> https://public-inbox.org/git/0648000B273C412AB7140AE959EBC99A%40PhilipOakley/ >> I had difficulty working out which email the last 4 were replying to. > > https://public-inbox.org/git/0648000B273C412AB7140AE959EBC99A%40PhilipOakley/ > So, right now, it's: > > 2016-07-20 21:10 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] doc: revisions - clarify > reachability examples Philip Oakley > 2016-07-20 22:22 ` Junio C Hamano > 2016-08-11 21:50 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Update git revisions > Philip Oakley > 2016-08-11 21:50 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] doc: use 'symmetric > difference' consistently Philip Oakley > 2016-06-25 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano > 2016-06-27 13:37 ` Philip Oakley > 2016-06-27 15:08 ` Junio C Hamano > 2016-06-27 15:39 ` Philip Oakley > > And you would rather see something like: > > 2016-07-20 21:10 . ` [PATCH v4 8/8] doc: revisions - clarify > reachability examples Philip Oakley > 2016-07-20 22:22 . ` Junio C Hamano > 2016-08-11 21:50 . ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Update git revisions > Philip Oakley > 2016-08-11 21:50 . ` [PATCH v5 01/12] doc: use 'symmetric > difference' consistently Philip Oakley > 2016-06-25 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano > 2016-06-27 13:37 ` Philip Oakley > 2016-06-27 15:08 ` Junio C Hamano > 2016-06-27 15:39 ` Philip Oakley > Not quite, something like: 2016-07-20 21:10 . . . . ` [PATCH v4 8/8] doc: revisions - clarify reachability examples Philip Oakley 2016-07-20 22:22 . . . . ` Junio C Hamano 2016-08-11 21:50 . . . . ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Update git revisions Philip Oakley 2016-08-11 21:50 . . . . . ` [PATCH v5 01/12] doc: use 'symmetric difference' consistently Philip Oakley 2016-06-25 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-06-27 13:37 ` Philip Oakley 2016-06-27 15:08 ` Junio C Hamano 2016-06-27 15:39 ` Philip Oakley I haven't filled in the last ones because there are no matching follow on replies, e.g to Junio' s 2016-06-25 19:49 message. (I may not have put in enough of the lead either) However for ease of formatting I guess that simply setting the indent to be '. ' rather than ' ' (both 2 chars) would create the impression of the messages being on an indent grid If rather than looking at those below junio's reply, you try and look at which message he was replying to, it's very hard (It's more than a full screen scroll up), hance the request for the alignment 'column of dots'. I think he was replying to my 2016-06-25 13:50, but it's not easy to be sure. > ? > > Actually, my initial inclination was to use the '|' character > which is what mutt does > > 2016-07-20 21:10 | } [PATCH v4 8/8] doc: revisions - clarify > reachability examples Philip Oakley > 2016-07-20 22:22 | } Junio C Hamano > 2016-08-11 21:50 | ` [PATCH v5 00/12] Update git revisions > Philip Oakley > 2016-08-11 21:50 | ` [PATCH v5 01/12] doc: use 'symmetric > difference' consistently Philip Oakley > 2016-06-25 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano > 2016-06-27 13:37 ` Philip Oakley > 2016-06-27 15:08 ` Junio C Hamano > 2016-06-27 15:39 ` Philip Oakley > > It should be doable, and the '`' immediately following the last > '|' probably ought to be a link to the parent, too. > I feel that the '¦' style chars will fill the screen too much (with '.' being the minimalist I can think of), but it's a personal choice. > I would also like to use '}' (as above) or '+' where mutt would > use "├─>" or just '├', but I don't think I can introduce multibyte > chars without causing problems for some users. > > Anyways, it's definitely on my ever-growing todo list. > > > (Wow, it is refreshing to be a "web designer" who can live > entirely in a terminal without relying on screenshots :D) > > Philip ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-12 7:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-08-11 7:01 Mapping old gmane numbers to existing amil servers? Philip Oakley 2016-08-11 7:56 ` Eric Wong 2016-08-11 21:00 ` Philip Oakley 2016-08-11 22:26 ` Eric Wong 2016-08-12 7:38 ` Philip Oakley
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).