From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CC81F5AE for ; Mon, 24 May 2021 05:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232120AbhEXFYM (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2021 01:24:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50428 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232159AbhEXFYM (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2021 01:24:12 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x42f.google.com (mail-pf1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6CAEC061574 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 22:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id g18so18225500pfr.2 for ; Sun, 23 May 2021 22:22:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+iBFSyATAWv0OGVSqwMx0UdJ5zTnWStf74NLCQvmBTA=; b=hE/Awhi1dnh+4pNpYTcj2nHCJfXfzHGSniErSSq66K/ZihhNu0Ofmd3x1Lkf1apziT JtHAyxTaf8ns7RQ4O0VR1E3UK46pWEAQ7bNbPC9ailk56BlRHFBr6+fnJg6OtIODf/nI nOaXipLpFq3XcsQLZx/y9e7R1gMEDCL7DxVUHg7j/QZ7EhfyFH7QQJBF4EX2nnl6Zry5 qj6keOHpd1OH/aLjDOQWmv+o4e3TT1A0EANeE2XmoDaeqQONxiuy6KKLGjUDhFhklBY0 IIwKonyTYW4ffcK+ubGhL60pprmODEMpriXIPvkoTnHWuURX6H6ivnFyviGSEKIjK6gw zcWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+iBFSyATAWv0OGVSqwMx0UdJ5zTnWStf74NLCQvmBTA=; b=itaPqdKRPafQGp/JG3yV5rVbfWlU5ZbzA58GrAlyqi262Wf34xtZcs11Z14jPnXvSq hbplum9STTqiS7SOBWRo3+w/xLTh5KqE1kS1GnG+LVBBGIubMCNz7wtkn/1uuIYnVKwJ bkB8M/QAwUZUIHWzj4UwHXvkMBd/FgeYGqofzV/LyVIJxPWBoSZZVnWBTWxYKIswW0SX TZ5+1mxAxZBtI6e6tAVDd8eWWd4nFeXouE6MR7QMwaXda82ovxwPAQS8WiaWRKuwvHcr yvi/DkGdrPOTtsRzAejtWBzYBv6Wx82PXMrHjSHc8VQyMQ6bnKRYvZyGVHIeCLEu5VQc JZjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5311f8ethLOEnbVVe+gpBdqHfm8QvrxYS2QvLfTrtlAf+Bjb4M1r eqq3ja0sDtP+/7aazB0MsAU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwIvibYxEfemlxerQnrcj9wKB8Sl+aboeA1QPZlxSpLEc4DktcD/eTuUHEq74kRMwkXO5KCHQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e058:: with SMTP id n24mr11580642pgj.91.1621833764210; Sun, 23 May 2021 22:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.80] (subs28-116-206-12-53.three.co.id. [116.206.12.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 63sm9835801pfz.26.2021.05.23.22.22.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 23 May 2021 22:22:43 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] [GSOC][RFC] ref-filter: add contents:raw atom To: Felipe Contreras , Junio C Hamano , ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder , Hariom Verma , Karthik Nayak , ZheNing Hu References: <60ab1246d2d14_1691c2083b@natae.notmuch> From: Bagas Sanjaya Message-ID: <72ce81a2-68eb-a750-8ca1-425af3cac370@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 12:22:39 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <60ab1246d2d14_1691c2083b@natae.notmuch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 24/05/21 09.41, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Is there another word to refer to the entire payload unadulterated? > > Another word better than "raw"? I don't think so: basic, crude, green, > rough. > I think we should go with "raw", because the payloads we discussed here are unmodified. It is akin to "raw data" that is processed further to produce porcelain output, such as templating engine that process raw HTML into HTML pages that would be served to end user. -- An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara