From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Matt Seitz (matseitz)" Subject: RE: Question about submodules and absolute paths Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 12:36:29 -0700 Message-ID: <70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31348C71F@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com> References: <7vk4043wc5.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org><70952A932255A2489522275A628B97C31348C70D@xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: "Junio C Hamano" , To: "Alexey Pelykh" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 22 21:36:39 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SWusm-0006cf-Nh for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 22 May 2012 21:36:37 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760284Ab2EVTgb (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2012 15:36:31 -0400 Received: from mtv-iport-3.cisco.com ([173.36.130.14]:35567 "EHLO mtv-iport-3.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758479Ab2EVTgb convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 May 2012 15:36:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=matseitz@cisco.com; l=390; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1337715391; x=1338924991; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=UXIGh7/ntA3LkjExenzr1frO3RPj57paA+YmqhKWWr4=; b=iJUpfvFh+x5vnvSRKZ89UhnlutvJPH6hSN32u6bmTh+AQOT2r+aYRY7T u0p1/QHXk/pZSanRHhBWG12iogpHg8D1lwOlQX1NtDmlQtRuWD5KZo7TX Vs9FFxStUTXw3/85wR4OsmWV+HOR8/yQUgua23QRRxAc5nrB6ILIZ16P1 U=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAGzpu0+rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABEtBeBB4IVAQEBAwESAR0KPwULAgEIFQ0GFwEGASAlEQEBBBMIEweHXgMGBAGaYpYNDYlSihqFSWIDiEOXUIMVgWSDCg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,639,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="43349495" Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 May 2012 19:36:30 +0000 Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4MJaUVv005987; Tue, 22 May 2012 19:36:30 GMT Received: from xmb-sjc-233.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.88]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 22 May 2012 12:36:30 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Question about submodules and absolute paths Thread-Index: Ac04UTCfyWtLZGn2TS+VBMOcB3mRYgAAHLaA X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 May 2012 19:36:30.0317 (UTC) FILETIME=[2FBF91D0:01CD3852] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > From: Alexey Pelykh [mailto:alexey.pelykh@gmail.com] > > Indeed this is a workaround, what I was thinking about to use. The thing I > wanted actually to discuss whether it worth to research possibility of > replacing these absolute paths with relative ones. Sure. I just wanted to offer an immediate, interim solution until there is a decision on the permanent solution.