git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
To: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com>,
	Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com>,
	Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sha1_file: remove static strbuf from sha1_file_name()
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 09:01:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65c81aae-5652-281f-565a-f6116d94abc1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180116071814.19884-1-chriscool@tuxfamily.org>

On 1/16/2018 2:18 AM, Christian Couder wrote:
> Using a static buffer in sha1_file_name() is error prone
> and the performance improvements it gives are not needed
> in most of the callers.
>
> So let's get rid of this static buffer and, if necessary
> or helpful, let's use one in the caller.

First: this is a good change for preventing bugs in the future. Do not 
let my next thought deter you from making this change.

Second: I wonder if there is any perf hit now that we are allocating 
buffers much more often. Also, how often does get_object_directory() 
change, so in some cases we could cache the buffer and only append the 
parts for the loose object (and not reallocate because the filenames 
will have equal length).

I'm concerned about the perf implications when inspecting many loose 
objects (100k+) but these code paths seem to be involved with more 
substantial work, such as opening and parsing the objects, so keeping a 
buffer in-memory is probably unnecessary.

> ---
>   cache.h       |  8 +++-----
>   http-walker.c |  6 ++++--
>   http.c        | 16 ++++++++++------
>   sha1_file.c   | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>   4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cache.h b/cache.h
> index d8b975a571..6db565408e 100644
> --- a/cache.h
> +++ b/cache.h
> @@ -957,12 +957,10 @@ extern void check_repository_format(void);
>   #define TYPE_CHANGED    0x0040
>   
>   /*
> - * Return the name of the file in the local object database that would
> - * be used to store a loose object with the specified sha1.  The
> - * return value is a pointer to a statically allocated buffer that is
> - * overwritten each time the function is called.
> + * Put in `buf` the name of the file in the local object database that
> + * would be used to store a loose object with the specified sha1.
>    */
> -extern const char *sha1_file_name(const unsigned char *sha1);
> +extern void sha1_file_name(struct strbuf *buf, const unsigned char *sha1);
>   
>   /*
>    * Return an abbreviated sha1 unique within this repository's object database.
> diff --git a/http-walker.c b/http-walker.c
> index 1ae8363de2..07c2b1af82 100644
> --- a/http-walker.c
> +++ b/http-walker.c
> @@ -544,8 +544,10 @@ static int fetch_object(struct walker *walker, unsigned char *sha1)
>   	} else if (hashcmp(obj_req->sha1, req->real_sha1)) {
>   		ret = error("File %s has bad hash", hex);
>   	} else if (req->rename < 0) {
> -		ret = error("unable to write sha1 filename %s",
> -			    sha1_file_name(req->sha1));
> +		struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +		sha1_file_name(&buf, req->sha1);
> +		ret = error("unable to write sha1 filename %s", buf.buf);
> +		strbuf_release(&buf);
>   	}
>   
>   	release_http_object_request(req);
> diff --git a/http.c b/http.c
> index 5977712712..5979305bc9 100644
> --- a/http.c
> +++ b/http.c
> @@ -2168,7 +2168,7 @@ struct http_object_request *new_http_object_request(const char *base_url,
>   	unsigned char *sha1)
>   {
>   	char *hex = sha1_to_hex(sha1);
> -	const char *filename;
> +	struct strbuf filename = STRBUF_INIT;
>   	char prevfile[PATH_MAX];
>   	int prevlocal;
>   	char prev_buf[PREV_BUF_SIZE];
> @@ -2180,14 +2180,15 @@ struct http_object_request *new_http_object_request(const char *base_url,
>   	hashcpy(freq->sha1, sha1);
>   	freq->localfile = -1;
>   
> -	filename = sha1_file_name(sha1);
> +	sha1_file_name(&filename, sha1);
>   	snprintf(freq->tmpfile, sizeof(freq->tmpfile),
> -		 "%s.temp", filename);
> +		 "%s.temp", filename.buf);
>   
> -	snprintf(prevfile, sizeof(prevfile), "%s.prev", filename);
> +	snprintf(prevfile, sizeof(prevfile), "%s.prev", filename.buf);
>   	unlink_or_warn(prevfile);
>   	rename(freq->tmpfile, prevfile);
>   	unlink_or_warn(freq->tmpfile);
> +	strbuf_release(&filename);
>   
>   	if (freq->localfile != -1)
>   		error("fd leakage in start: %d", freq->localfile);
> @@ -2302,6 +2303,7 @@ void process_http_object_request(struct http_object_request *freq)
>   int finish_http_object_request(struct http_object_request *freq)
>   {
>   	struct stat st;
> +	struct strbuf filename = STRBUF_INIT;
>   
>   	close(freq->localfile);
>   	freq->localfile = -1;
> @@ -2327,8 +2329,10 @@ int finish_http_object_request(struct http_object_request *freq)
>   		unlink_or_warn(freq->tmpfile);
>   		return -1;
>   	}
> -	freq->rename =
> -		finalize_object_file(freq->tmpfile, sha1_file_name(freq->sha1));
> +
> +	sha1_file_name(&filename, freq->sha1);
> +	freq->rename = finalize_object_file(freq->tmpfile, filename.buf);
> +	strbuf_release(&filename);
>   
>   	return freq->rename;
>   }
> diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c
> index 3da70ac650..f66c21b2da 100644
> --- a/sha1_file.c
> +++ b/sha1_file.c
> @@ -321,15 +321,11 @@ static void fill_sha1_path(struct strbuf *buf, const unsigned char *sha1)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -const char *sha1_file_name(const unsigned char *sha1)
> +void sha1_file_name(struct strbuf *buf, const unsigned char *sha1)
>   {
> -	static struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> -
> -	strbuf_reset(&buf);
> -	strbuf_addf(&buf, "%s/", get_object_directory());
> +	strbuf_addf(buf, "%s/", get_object_directory());
>   
> -	fill_sha1_path(&buf, sha1);
> -	return buf.buf;
> +	fill_sha1_path(buf, sha1);
>   }

Could you change this to use strbuf_addstr(buf, get_object_directory()) 
followed by a strbuf_addch(buf, '/')? This format string is unnecessary 
and could become slow if this method is called in a tight loop.

>   
>   struct strbuf *alt_scratch_buf(struct alternate_object_database *alt)
> @@ -710,7 +706,12 @@ int check_and_freshen_file(const char *fn, int freshen)
>   
>   static int check_and_freshen_local(const unsigned char *sha1, int freshen)
>   {
> -	return check_and_freshen_file(sha1_file_name(sha1), freshen);
> +	static struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> +	strbuf_reset(&buf);
> +	sha1_file_name(&buf, sha1);
> +
> +	return check_and_freshen_file(buf.buf, freshen);
>   }
>   
>   static int check_and_freshen_nonlocal(const unsigned char *sha1, int freshen)
> @@ -866,8 +867,12 @@ static int stat_sha1_file(const unsigned char *sha1, struct stat *st,
>   			  const char **path)
>   {
>   	struct alternate_object_database *alt;
> +	static struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> +	strbuf_reset(&buf);
> +	sha1_file_name(&buf, sha1);
> +	*path = buf.buf;
>   
> -	*path = sha1_file_name(sha1);
>   	if (!lstat(*path, st))
>   		return 0;
>   
> @@ -891,8 +896,12 @@ static int open_sha1_file(const unsigned char *sha1, const char **path)
>   	int fd;
>   	struct alternate_object_database *alt;
>   	int most_interesting_errno;
> +	static struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> +	strbuf_reset(&buf);
> +	sha1_file_name(&buf, sha1);
> +	*path = buf.buf;
>   
> -	*path = sha1_file_name(sha1);
>   	fd = git_open(*path);
>   	if (fd >= 0)
>   		return fd;

The check_and_freshen_nonlocal() and open_sha1_file() method comments 
warn about the 'path' pointer and how it could be overwritten with 
another call to sha1_file_name(). Your patch fixes that issue, so the 
comments can be removed.

Since these methods are currently being extra careful about the 'path' 
parameter, perhaps these are candidates to keep a static buffer around?

> @@ -1557,9 +1566,12 @@ static int write_loose_object(const unsigned char *sha1, char *hdr, int hdrlen,
>   	git_SHA_CTX c;
>   	unsigned char parano_sha1[20];
>   	static struct strbuf tmp_file = STRBUF_INIT;
> -	const char *filename = sha1_file_name(sha1);
> +	static struct strbuf filename = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> +	strbuf_reset(&filename);
> +	sha1_file_name(&filename, sha1);
>   
> -	fd = create_tmpfile(&tmp_file, filename);
> +	fd = create_tmpfile(&tmp_file, filename.buf);
>   	if (fd < 0) {
>   		if (errno == EACCES)
>   			return error("insufficient permission for adding an object to repository database %s", get_object_directory());
> @@ -1612,7 +1624,7 @@ static int write_loose_object(const unsigned char *sha1, char *hdr, int hdrlen,
>   			warning_errno("failed utime() on %s", tmp_file.buf);
>   	}
>   
> -	return finalize_object_file(tmp_file.buf, filename);
> +	return finalize_object_file(tmp_file.buf, filename.buf);
>   }
>   
>   static int freshen_loose_object(const unsigned char *sha1)

Thanks for this cleanup!
-Stolee

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-16 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-16  7:18 [PATCH] sha1_file: remove static strbuf from sha1_file_name() Christian Couder
2018-01-16 14:01 ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2018-01-16 19:00   ` Jeff Hostetler
2018-01-17 17:55     ` Christian Couder
2018-01-16 17:25 ` Kevin Daudt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65c81aae-5652-281f-565a-f6116d94abc1@gmail.com \
    --to=stolee@gmail.com \
    --cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=jeffhost@microsoft.com \
    --cc=jonathantanmy@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).