From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822551F453 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730089AbfDYLGK (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 07:06:10 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com ([209.85.160.193]:44819 "EHLO mail-qt1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726979AbfDYLGK (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 07:06:10 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id s10so13052638qtc.11 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:06:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+4lDOQA1RDcRVTOY77uQhImFQp8Pt3aVuMjyaXcPsQ8=; b=HZDBx/dmtBrEqtNGPbOEK5QAWBWmYz9ZaZykFL4HefPfM0rFKsFg4brlguPQKbLQ6b fCPGfFmLe2BYFd/c45O2Peb4h3Ol/ll3jTX3yd46EJniw1FZ+pG/9b/DKCtfk1+ypuMw SdwyCsPSLrosltvzgktVU1Q6ePL/7SkTcFb9Q29/YmL5a8XIeXHYnQpbVqEE0s2go1m7 uLeI5TOs9LBMWaz4lZvSB4IHvae44m2sUVK190l8KInnD3l5N53UlKp00joahEYH1fJf QMAqhniIxSOqnxWd9713lyxEECLhSMcfOopIoLfrJacNY8jk5OpPqe5lCLT2etUGF9fF 61JA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+4lDOQA1RDcRVTOY77uQhImFQp8Pt3aVuMjyaXcPsQ8=; b=rq1W2jTfbISeZlhT0urFD0eizrbPtT2dWEp7ETo1W4wkxuk+G6Jad2FlcCWNqrC0GZ JRU6VgHHFsIJO0mmKw2ElF7hzicqN19JlhdyPu3cEpPtPNxSOkWrb2tKLxK0PmnqphpL iOBxdh8AYb9gXrNBgCJHekQww3L3x/ONfIz7lN1ZVd93R+JHlHykf+rvJKifuZM72Dca wylRAr5HeQKYo25N4CXJgky118qkZ6li0+zgkTFZOTs9kddn8HubZVVWMYO/PxYl3OjR Mcw8fIQenl4+xPe/NXdoDdOLwtBrkfCrYWpleqdLerrw8TQthnv/oVzsheos/0b60yln 01Aw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVOz1G/HAubt5zcwaupmA50ciRgtr1GkUJRXgd/K7miahAyvi0E wHQ7ATuHkk9FtAPulGzZsw4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwxC6utDUtxxbaSGVtJAJcMQCmHto4mcbCo0p+Lr56HwGaavh4wNzXJfHcn0tVcHzGP5ZNtbw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:396e:: with SMTP id t43mr10288550qtb.1.1556190368816; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.5] ([98.122.173.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e6sm10453950qtr.56.2019.04.25.04.06.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 04:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] Create 'expire' and 'repack' verbs for git-multi-pack-index To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, peff@peff.net, jrnieder@gmail.com, avarab@gmail.com, Derrick Stolee References: <20190424151428.170316-1-dstolee@microsoft.com> From: Derrick Stolee Message-ID: <651dd41f-4d16-8adf-e128-7ca2f5eff907@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 07:06:06 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:66.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/66.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 4/25/2019 1:38 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Derrick Stolee writes: > >> Updates in V5: >> >> * Fixed the error in PATCH 7 due to a missing line that existed in PATCH 8. Thanks, Josh Steadmon! >> >> * The 'repack' subcommand now computes the "expected size" of a pack instead of >> relying on the total size of the pack. This is actually really important to >> the way VFS for Git uses prefetch packs, and some packs are not being >> repacked because the pack size is larger than the batch size, but really >> there are only a few referenced objects. >> >> * The 'repack' subcommand now allows a batch size of zero to mean "create one >> pack containing all objects in the multi-pack-index". A new commit adds a >> test that hits the boundary cases here, but follows the 'expire' subcommand >> so we can show that cycle of repack-then-expire to safely replace the packs. > > I guess all of them need to tweak the authorship from the gmail > address to the work address on the Signed-off-by: trailer, which I > can do (as I noticed it before applying). Sorry. Due to the conflicts, GitGitGadget prevented me from submitting in my normal way, so I pulled out format-patch and send-email for the first time in a very long time. I manually added new "From: " lines in the bodies of the patch files, but they got suppressed, I guess. Thanks, -Stolee