From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan del Strother Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixing path quoting issues Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:22:48 +0100 Message-ID: <63D5CE5B-51DD-4017-B2E2-2ADC5DCBE849@steelskies.com> References: <11920508172434-git-send-email-jon.delStrother@bestbefore.tv> <470DC05A.8020209@viscovery.net> <854pgytafi.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <470DCC76.7070809@viscovery.net> <81156EED-7AC0-4C8B-98B1-8338262459A6@bestbefore.tv> <470DD3B8.1080809@viscovery.net> <85k5pts796.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano To: David Kastrup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 11 23:23:35 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ig5V1-0004Xb-3o for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 23:23:19 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755902AbXJKVWw (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:22:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755694AbXJKVWw (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:22:52 -0400 Received: from smtp1.betherenow.co.uk ([87.194.0.68]:52437 "EHLO smtp1.bethere.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754905AbXJKVWv (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:22:51 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.65] (87-194-43-188.bethere.co.uk [87.194.43.188]) by smtp1.bethere.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B98098114; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 22:22:49 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <85k5pts796.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 11 Oct 2007, at 21:53, David Kastrup wrote: > Johannes Sixt writes: > >> Jonathan del Strother schrieb: >>> How are you going to test that git works on paths with spaces if the >>> test suite doesn't run there? >> >> By writing a specific test? > > This is going to be much less thorough. And it does no harm if the > test scripts demonstrate defensive programming. I would also point out that most tests have already been written to handle this case - ones that don't quote their paths are in the minority.