From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 983511F5AE for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 17:26:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230303AbhFOR2n (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:28:43 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52436 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229743AbhFOR2m (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 13:28:42 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E9F0C061574 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:26:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id i12-20020a05683033ecb02903346fa0f74dso15038304otu.10 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:26:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qPgRlirlVwk5WwM4DJbVbuFzFMET8//DBO6whKsIeXI=; b=oFUgD6YxclyGXW1YPNIuw0u923AiezI9C+TKvdj48vLgAbouh0TY080vX0k0nOCoDZ PNbXgZQoB6kLiaSKKNPNZX1xupix4sFZHKUm2an61gS5BP5UWAvEPpN77O/L2WzjxxJS 49mRv4cHyiEhVjeqmXb0N+VoCPK4DnS1NIt9kahmhvhCEbJ1rdAidUIfElAziPwQj95M 07IhVv3HI4OaCKGO9X40L5l52Iz5RhhakBRJ0bl/A+2Z/C3DZnaKd+jv6dO4ifDqqW2d wZQI6pvdPnQ0FWRwItAYF18j4kHhEhbgR8dSWudy874+R4AJpQ4slTK4BMpj3IxrihMo o0Jg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qPgRlirlVwk5WwM4DJbVbuFzFMET8//DBO6whKsIeXI=; b=SEMzBkm9ozhl6zbXLk6LvkrAeDSuUZWdOe0t4uO1yZnr/iYhJPOrhEiiBGkTOVwyR0 L2ual0Rk3rx2Cq6Hq3oCUFgKbOLuaX1It1UzaVkKEm4SrnbVDzJ0jbbOKFV4TuzOKBhz LIa+KmHx/lJydZrAP5jyXzfLmiGCfzduKqwTKny7oUX0N1OtqjXXBEjdVN3in2Xyvi1w 5zqzT2/+SVfFD5muttSGlQgKeAZ4/xEoUtv6WGEbDF4hN/IV1k2d8aCPWpK/esJHoyFb UzUEXjTaoFzRKjFaymxMQK79GZg1u68g0Zw7UcqDluUAORF+Ekd8UztDf4G3UvpBut9O Q0xA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316qkTTLbXCr13E42domrEuo5o8NmbzmqpInOFlUrn+iMcWDATL 2JBh33Xdk03tVzhbVLbv3O0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx973Oz+L9IHvLuO/r8iU+C8YhVd5NG2kluQDgT/pcnO3E/q35AU2NTR39i0VbxY0iH6NKOFA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6a10:: with SMTP id g16mr281506otn.71.1623777997495; Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fixed-187-188-155-231.totalplay.net. [187.188.155.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c5sm2009186oiw.7.2021.06.15.10.26.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 15 Jun 2021 10:26:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:26:35 -0500 From: Felipe Contreras To: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= , Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, sandals@crustytoothpaste.net, stolee@gmail.com, jrnieder@gmail.com, emilyshaffer@google.com, Andrei Rybak , Felipe Contreras , Robert Karszniewicz , Jeff King , "Kerry, Richard" , Phillip Susi , Johannes Schindelin , Bagas Sanjaya , Derrick Stolee , Derrick Stolee Message-ID: <60c8e2cb81e50_12c28208c2@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <87a6nryt51.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> References: <87a6nryt51.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] CodingGuidelines: recommend singular they Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15 2021, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote: > Anyway, I don't think I'll be participating in this topic any > further. It seems you're not interested in pursuing alternate approache= s > that accomplish your goals, or in responding to specific point-by-point= > feedback on your series from myself and others. > = > I do think it would be a much better and respectful use of everyone's > time on this ML if you clearly stated your unwillingness to deviate fro= m > the narrow approach in the initial version of a series you're > submitting. For what it's worth I also feel that's the case. 95% of my suggestions for improvement were completely ignored, and it's only when the maintainer threatened to merge my competing series, that I started receiving responses. I don't believe critical feedback has been welcomed, I don't believe my time as a reviewer was respected, and mostly it felt like talking to a wall. I find it ironic that a patch series that boasts of promoting inclusion and diversity completely ignores the most important diversity the project should care about: Diversity of thought. While claiming to be trying to avoid hypothetical people from feeling excluded, it actively excluded the opinions of actual people. -- = Felipe Contreras=