From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAF11F5AE for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 17:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232011AbhFMRPe (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 13:15:34 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f177.google.com ([209.85.167.177]:41623 "EHLO mail-oi1-f177.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231951AbhFMRPd (ORCPT ); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 13:15:33 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f177.google.com with SMTP id t40so11889051oiw.8 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 10:13:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I6rIhvUkpM5JeDCHHAwVNlsx1QHrOtdL+9CXBr7nkoM=; b=HCWiDJYGTIAcFvAuC3iYcGomE6AbxE6+2o9Mn9uBk8nAlrYwibmKlUFU3PC/9jx5z9 hdxPYiCf9SjkVLfE05IbPfvLD6SFCDVPEzB/vzfFYr1OE1qBJ9M8pf5UpXTjGVqIl8zo /Sb7+v7Vp+rDAf7pKjxkAiaK2BgYcYhDgoaRfEna+laKao5n6coEmTZVO1O4/4vj1ZkL OXYHSYos3LOURI5iImhZNklDWlovmYvcInXAE8Uz/D6xpPR+ddN8q8Ykv4bfLpXO5m30 xOpgW2WXSgwo4U6GUQCM1NvztV2cad30FXFpIxcBqQS5D9NpdUQzkKJ4EF/g90nv42XA oaTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=I6rIhvUkpM5JeDCHHAwVNlsx1QHrOtdL+9CXBr7nkoM=; b=OnDf34EY12iMu6AO8bbDHywYlDWCivFpANKoqWvqFmKjz6BcRK7/EwZUeJqxhIFiKn G7UIJeu8j2/CnhWCqQmSjaZIDEm4P7G4Jw/Zis+cPoHS/Zze7Tyw3YXnU12uEU/wzKKY fyIGAgBDGIPpmPTClpBCVsBYd1tcNKOeD4EPHgnz9uX2Yy+f9p+TK1aGe0iFdsqVB82H x6MIazCZS8EsOhzscQ6aFT3DGjlozIisugTIYnYJL7/o/QeenH8zP6UVj27Gh/p+5DAR PAGdQza2mb4rL2jBlrOTakhDPPDz3y16YFWO+0SSDlAFsQ9rNSe2a0seRnh7+nQSLYvT Zf1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532seuKMfe1eUo9kvKmt/1av8XEhz3phAT9AgOFA8XMYGHJkYbbh 5fXgY7lTiyC+Bt10jdEyaNY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2VRApJUz6wEYpFEaUCJJwollHnQFC1psykv7Lf1lFl6Mkqd9cgpAGHU7TTeHtTZR/wtSvyA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:6207:: with SMTP id w7mr19697924oib.177.1623604338390; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 10:12:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fixed-187-188-155-231.totalplay.net. [187.188.155.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i5sm863560oov.21.2021.06.13.10.12.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 13 Jun 2021 10:12:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 12:12:16 -0500 From: Felipe Contreras To: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGFsIFN1Y2jDoW5law==?= , Felipe Contreras Cc: Varun Varada , Robert Coup , git@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <60c63c70c7cbe_41f4520874@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <20210613162802.GG8544@kitsune.suse.cz> References: <20210513074622.GG8544@kitsune.suse.cz> <20210513094818.GH8544@kitsune.suse.cz> <20210527114629.GD8544@kitsune.suse.cz> <60afa7d9d4ca_2056d208d9@natae.notmuch> <20210527143541.GH8544@kitsune.suse.cz> <20210613114007.GF8544@kitsune.suse.cz> <60c610f04b288_41f2b208ce@natae.notmuch> <20210613162802.GG8544@kitsune.suse.cz> Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: replace jargon word "impact" with "effect"/"affect" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Michal Such=C3=A1nek wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 09:06:40AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > Michal Such=C3=A1nek wrote: > > > We already received such reviews as response to your patch. It's no= t > > > what-if. > > = > > In case you haven't been following this thread closely, you are the o= nly > > person that says the use of "impact" is OK. One person said "impact" = was > = > Apparently you have not followed this thread closely yourself. I have. If you think you have, then list all the people that agree with you that there's no problem with "impact" for the general population. > > It's OK to merge patches where one person objects. > = > Apprantly you also missed that I am not opposed to the patch. Good. So some people are in favor of the patch, and nobody is against it. -- = Felipe Contreras=