From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BB71F5AE for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 20:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229678AbhFIUUe (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:20:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59788 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229504AbhFIUUe (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:20:34 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC4D1C061574 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 13:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id q5-20020a9d66450000b02903f18d65089fso8993404otm.11 for ; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 13:18:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ayk9LMsAY2PazgO98xFZlmRE7CFnH/XW2sTWLs5mcwI=; b=O2ELV7yMf+V3x0XWK5cPS5D4lJgT0JyxLg26T36gwFj9j1l639G2S0kYvm62K2QQgb 2wwT4TvgtW7xg4kGu4SJc+d74tu8/iOS9t/PZK6Lnqiwdwr1bche4LiL/C7oLhlVtaQa hWchYO/mknXEYsAiDQ+6WW1NutvjbgUL1mT2JP6BXQ3U13HpI0DWUvGOwHoX1+UcxOO1 3htZdNMB2lJbt8p4e/8eky42i4seXdaO3McnpaWMfagoHtCYShEOUyfFti5OCTh+gT3S VU1+NIVhPIDYUahCvsZBhYkN2JVH+yD+/OEk3JBWxwy6pg2EqkErI8LDV5LGwqxGVnBv g8kQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ayk9LMsAY2PazgO98xFZlmRE7CFnH/XW2sTWLs5mcwI=; b=H5757PWX75l8YM6hnbimJQbDeHFoq8i4SmhIjLmrRsoZwFMISW2n984gIljCuXZhW4 sxuPejVE4Vwwe8DRTm/xJNN0OZyzOn0RjVT17s/PkFoyRgk4OvJ23sWk5IJadFB5mMJ/ zJtU73H2GCayr9eAiV8/WPnMARWbmSkUVFAGxerTa9Ma5Q/2wzbqqn/kjIjJQ7x8tLYY VFHyprV3ykD4qqMas6VyxdBMrRuW7cLvMhtPwBjE92cTZTboO7ilFFFFVW2SAz1CKRG/ 66ky+nRrMqtkZ8X5FZfMweSNHUd+5FTDMfc7FfMG2ZmO+k7eRh7tbaEnhwT7wb7PFIiJ khFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531eXQdS7UfSoA05D4BsLb7GiH3RsDJfJkzQxPuOk9wiI1rJ7pUi CpqKjpCA6/9Ck5HkNclDF7KnJkwYGND+Gg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLJXZvi+UTOQQx+7+uo3M027Dhyi1nrJUmNPLglvcRznhfYD1XoDJ0hd/oug8OAXbKE6b9cA== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:718d:: with SMTP id o13mr952995otj.271.1623269905076; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 13:18:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fixed-187-188-155-231.totalplay.net. [187.188.155.231]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w186sm157141oib.58.2021.06.09.13.18.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Jun 2021 13:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 15:18:23 -0500 From: Felipe Contreras To: Phillip Susi , Felipe Contreras Cc: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, sandals@crustytoothpaste.net, stolee@gmail.com, jrnieder@gmail.com, emilyshaffer@google.com, Derrick Stolee , Derrick Stolee Message-ID: <60c1220f1ce69_aa2ee2088c@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <87fsxq98xq.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> References: <60be7adcdf3b_db9162081e@natae.notmuch> <87fsxq98xq.fsf@vps.thesusis.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] CodingGuidelines: recommend singular they Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Phillip Susi wrote: > Felipe Contreras writes: > > > Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote: > >> From: Derrick Stolee > >> > >> Technical writing seeks to convey information with minimal friction. One > >> way that a reader can experience friction is if they encounter a > >> description of "a user" that is later simplified using a gendered > >> pronoun. If the reader does not consider that pronoun to apply to them, > >> then they can experience cognitive dissonance that removes focus from > >> the information. > > Why should the pronoun apply to the reader? If the documentation wants > to refer to the reader, it should use "you". If it's using "he" then > it's referring to someone else previously mentioned in the > documentation, not to me. Indeed, and the patches don't apply exclusively to the reader. Here [1] the relevant person is somebody else who rebased a branch. It is unclear what kind of "cognitive dissonance" would a reader experience when she reads that that somebody happens to be a she. > > You can use "nucular" if you want (many people do). I will use > > "nuclear". > > You can use "nucular", but you will look stupid. I do think so, but that doesn't stop people from using it. Such is the nature of language. > > Both can be valid, and we shouldn't demand the use of one over the > > other. > > Sure we can; one is not valid. You also may not "axe" me a question, or > drink an "expresso". According to some dictionaries "nucular" is valid [2]. Plus, I don't think "valid" is the right word. Some people have a descpritive view of language, and in that view all words are valid, or rather: no word is invalid. What makes words land in a dictionary is simply how much people use them. The word "cute" used to mean "clever" [3], and it was "invalid" to use it as we use it today. But people didn't care, and the meaning of the word was forced to change. Dictioaries simply recorded the will of the people. > Also you argued against using they because it is not standard English, > but then argued that it is fine to use non standard English. I didn't argue either of those things. Yes, I did argue that "single they" isn't part of standard English (with a semantically singular antecedent), that doesn't necessary mean we shouldn't use it. And I did argue "nucular" is part of standard English (many people use it), that doesn't mean we should use it. Basically whether or not a word is part of "standard English" is orthogonal to the fact that we should use it. In my view. Let me be clear on what I do argue: we shouldn't ban perfectly standard words such as "she" and "he". Cheers. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/fb7a7573782ae8ba3bc5341d6aaee704af88fdcf.1623246878.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com/ [2] https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/nucular [3] https://slate.com/human-interest/2015/02/cute-etymology-and-history-from-sharp-keen-or-shrewd-to-charming-and-attractive.html -- Felipe Contreras