From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCE31F5AE for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 16:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229756AbhE3Q3m (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 May 2021 12:29:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35102 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229671AbhE3Q3l (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 May 2021 12:29:41 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91B63C061574 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 09:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id z3so9901079oib.5 for ; Sun, 30 May 2021 09:28:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JK3Yf7MzVI2ByqmZWRLfFxmgjmEQYdgAPGaPJBmTc2o=; b=VOkOYt+jgJEu/Zo4O4qO/vGnd07ZsQ6NC2WtCsnaz7L7UCBz0tJTa5a2E9IwGAwj9p ltd9zwbj16198BkpwIPIzaSbkSmNetp79u6GMrNiUHQC3gdW/v3lu6E/kh4aQjoruYFM eyWHbrg44xeJiSRvnVlNH0HwM1ofLOgEVyhevSOxLsWRyVLmeBxUIE644Tb3c5SlHThQ sGK/xwPL4gn4w65z1Aa4yelj8h7JlKu8PO9KbCKolS2s2IJmy8jn+LSc6WPCvpzBbcms tiy7ZPaNy78EYo5czrenur5hZNze+XzvJXBXdO6zOt5vUpCaG6dPHjrYXHCAlGt41Ups s2Tg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JK3Yf7MzVI2ByqmZWRLfFxmgjmEQYdgAPGaPJBmTc2o=; b=PIfzRz+wYMgcR/Z84x8L6IhiUJrnK8xcqCgCTGPBPfKSAAuFtsb61ie/Pc9dhYmeRL pq5ZiEExcKkUAJ9JQzYmk+kae3MtFbEuDYvVksohxO/I549FciqOnvN2Lb0GD2j9Hf7X 2zq7SQdlpG6LFV5NHxOoE3asBQaaB3HG5vKcWp61CGtT5oZH3QgdvspD2Jx2dvTMerjy nS3we5LE1KhujkZCI+HPXgJw63CTbzTVmZ65NMkFMWijBPOFY4Ntjx/OSGxaf46x9bz9 LNPhQMHE8YkxBOZlItFgmnLQ6CmJYke9kfWTnWber8uJxW831fUE8Cb27BtBp54DKh5y 1FqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530kQ8UpCbz2RdzeqM9UId5n1XucqHjC0Z9GJ4fpsKV7ifUDvV+e L9JqCLpYpjNFuK9nKLCzOp8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwjkfgN6tv0JXbQjlGl0bP95NNGEN5HNNlr75yUzaHp3WdpWiNr+oDh6LiBG9OWRKpnCVCw5Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:10d:: with SMTP id b13mr1611476oie.15.1622392081921; Sun, 30 May 2021 09:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fixed-187-190-78-172.totalplay.net. [187.190.78.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f2sm2494476otp.77.2021.05.30.09.28.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 30 May 2021 09:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 30 May 2021 11:27:59 -0500 From: Felipe Contreras To: Philip Oakley , Felipe Contreras , git@vger.kernel.org Cc: Elijah Newren , Mathias Kunter , =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= , Ramkumar Ramachandra , Jeff King , =?UTF-8?B?UmVuw6kgU2NoYXJmZQ==?= , Matthieu Moy , Junio C Hamano Message-ID: <60b3bd0fb6d4c_b937208dc@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: References: <20210529071115.1908310-1-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Unconvolutize push.default=simple Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Philip Oakley wrote: > On 29/05/2021 08:11, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > Tired of jumping through hoops trying to understand what the "simple"= > > mode does, I decided to reorganize it up for good so it's crystal > > clear. > > > > There are no functional changes. > > > > Basically the simple mode pushes the current branch with the same nam= e > > on the remote. > > > > Except... when there's no upstream branch configured with the same na= me. > > > > Now the code and the documentation are clear. > = > Not your problem, but I do note, as a general point, that we don't > explain the different variants of Triangular workflow anywhere [just tw= o > mentions in gitrevisions.txt] (e.g. patch flow versus server-side > merges, etc.).=C2=A0 All my documentation improvements get stuck in tar, so somebody else would need to do that. If and when they do, it will become clear the big pit in functionality there is. -- = Felipe Contreras=