From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5AA1F5AE for ; Wed, 12 May 2021 03:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229954AbhELDDu (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 23:03:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49938 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229932AbhELDDu (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 23:03:50 -0400 Received: from mail-oo1-xc2f.google.com (mail-oo1-xc2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F254C061574 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 20:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oo1-xc2f.google.com with SMTP id t17-20020a4a3e110000b02901fab2f46a48so4658099oot.6 for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 20:02:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=575LtBSgLQU6P1uV3zTJcTOKI01/B/kUdpVj0Qjjym8=; b=Lm32xKTybduCdyNuNHHfEeSTSk770INn+FpaueipcCyWTuSBvn/2oe/WKen2U1xG/3 on5LHW6/OwTgfdgr1kjVeOEePNglXVqA/eHrD5tG08hQL3LiUQ+6+dAX/fNq4VyaClk9 E824B44Dtk5+plbYnB3u96cfxHLo+iaw7oit6f7iwzY3SREIiAGfKH7WRVtAqbIyYhUb mkhjsDiI43mBOa9qbTg4Ot1wDgh5OvbY6jK8yU0oSLqzMiOsV1R/uGcYmn8qfFY+7qhn P+WBRljAikjXAdd7eejjZd7azxwbO4yiiZN9WsXXKEWsRjb+WZqOFPZm2Or5VxHboDwf UEeg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=575LtBSgLQU6P1uV3zTJcTOKI01/B/kUdpVj0Qjjym8=; b=I4KfilxpdVXgZ3WD5zbW/o1QxscDGKyVFAlELl4jB29xxO/lw4mdYzQ8RHCHpNrF82 +rsYmZp5MxEpJRqN6xoQNJj+IqKWElcwoNFYJzYZqGHOhT9HyznDzYC7YLWmIaLBe0ZK X6sMpoJ0N5IJTUGc1ci8CAekuNiQjNbvljAbGqojfDtB2s6Cgu8vtIqVDe+SgVhTjr7z 96bj4FqaGk4CrdZpDOug0TObL4PcFnMnH8XDfU0TwAVnKS3LofIW4CQOyn1q/mwh8iNI YELtjvyzp0MpQZrot4qkAaYmp3CdwoNcH3Oe418T33yt9zxx2iFEvqZJoBU4b3HL3iNf NkAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532xt52qrPFVoW0J61hiAvmt6V9SW3juMSo7vcqiDaXuZEOxrwak ojuwOHwF+0C+SrQjYJh1q5o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw6DkHkBjS6P4TN4dvLNQQ07M9928wB3WLRVbiK8wrOcHK8r/6j9QSrE5sJXpEVpQC97EAHCg== X-Received: by 2002:a4a:e61a:: with SMTP id f26mr26122695oot.76.1620788561748; Tue, 11 May 2021 20:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (fixed-187-190-78-172.totalplay.net. [187.190.78.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l11sm3690882ooq.44.2021.05.11.20.02.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 11 May 2021 20:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 22:02:37 -0500 From: Felipe Contreras To: Junio C Hamano , =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGFsIFN1Y2jDoW5law==?= Cc: Varun Varada , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <609b454d33df2_678ff208f9@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: References: <20210428085838.GN6564@kitsune.suse.cz> <20210428184956.GS6564@kitsune.suse.cz> <20210430075924.GB6564@kitsune.suse.cz> <20210510173502.GH12700@kitsune.suse.cz> <20210511104326.GJ12700@kitsune.suse.cz> Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: replace jargon word "impact" with "effect"/"affect" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano wrote: > As you said, lack of a specific example of what is universally > confusing, or at least confusing to a not-so-insignificant part of > the readership, was why this change didn't gain much support. The original version doesn't necessarily need to be confusing. It's sufficient that the new version is better. > There might be one or two such places where the updated text does read > better, but it is not a very good use of reviewers' time to find such > needles in 700+ line haystack of a patch. As a reviewer I will decide where I to allocate my reviewer's time, because it's my time. -- Felipe Contreras