From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851F71F5AE for ; Tue, 11 May 2021 05:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229994AbhEKFNv (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 01:13:51 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36136 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229885AbhEKFNv (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 May 2021 01:13:51 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x335.google.com (mail-ot1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::335]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 796CBC061574 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 22:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x335.google.com with SMTP id r26-20020a056830121ab02902a5ff1c9b81so16506493otp.11 for ; Mon, 10 May 2021 22:12:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=26HHYVlndVqnBIfL2RCCT06EmxDrfRx5+U5R5zEkUho=; b=XX0Bu2tPObolY6NncXpT4RhEc/hRFfaAcu+PGzRaZJfnLIXnKTFVQk9s//cwfwGuuI bVokcaG48a9DXnsxUEtAN910Vx5GWKI+InC6Q7Iz5b/MUTDAr8kp3jWXJ4PO8UnStHX6 TPyIie9HCC4pWgW4dB6rvFOpxpfVo4IBZX3xyNKFnkP9/vd9/z9OGds7aq9R25MwcM/8 i01ssaTgdSl4Nx8eIB0g/vrjyX8H4O5TlTbq/fqTsz9TtqYUG6u6fsSNd40EBR2FP8C1 DPUh4bgzJUSOVdVqtvoAU0oRJkE70TVZpCYZhmJZjN5vOiMfpeIRaLbYQxvwQXV9Fd1D J7Eg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=26HHYVlndVqnBIfL2RCCT06EmxDrfRx5+U5R5zEkUho=; b=Bf3SZvYjBGvixEfQn/6fUZXyfOV7yfhlk6PL1+UYOuAR4E0HacWTsqyBXHRFZ3+xFU 2y2VinNC7EK8FDcxJIp/9wmR8PUdFzlVkr/k3U46lX+H+31+Jdf3VMsJes2TBwKz6CJY zg+zNIMQmurZe5nU1fCtsOdhZDrSV1wW7FkJsRf+RmoxrcEVw2pSTIAhtzt1F0PFoAVv FhpB7UwmuGXKQ43Quz9z1OzVFGM3z+777CNX6vD8Ey7Pnp7RaXf/AdjIltdv0Z0A9y1m fYoliM7ERdlLSNGVng5cxKd6Hu15URJzUS8mEF3aKHTvuRUdslQe62W1xgCQ7RfyNvVN Z2Rg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533GK7FGCzqdSFMYEnJvPiqUKaEVMpVQ2g8qMD5NlQeAmrODUgjo yNBDOsx6NOHHRr4MO3rSimY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzY69PCjofvPsd+pt+pQlQfh9/etYz/yfKf0nNvhtvkJVZStkUfhm4mKofCjeF7CKZz9DTenw== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:7490:: with SMTP id t16mr25733583otk.363.1620709963963; Mon, 10 May 2021 22:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2806:2f0:4060:638f:a2c5:89ff:fe0c:1151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e7sm1688197oos.15.2021.05.10.22.12.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 May 2021 22:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 00:12:42 -0500 From: Felipe Contreras To: Firmin Martin , Denton Liu , Felipe Contreras Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Jeff King , Johannes Schindelin , Erik Faye-Lund Message-ID: <609a124a3cdd6_5b0e12081c@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <87tunaf54u.fsf@Inspiron.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <20210506165102.123739-1-firminmartin24@gmail.com> <60949be8613c1_8c2220882@natae.notmuch> <87tunaf54u.fsf@Inspiron.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/8] format-patch: introduce --confirm-overwrite Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Firmin Martin wrote: > Denton Liu writes: > > It seems like everyone has written some sort of tooling on top of > > format-patch at this point. Taking a cursory look at your tool, perhaps > > a feature like `--previous-cover-letter ` might provide most of > > the functionality that most tooling that I've seen gives. > > This is a good idea. We can default to the target cover letter > (e.g., if -v2 is passed, v2-0000-cover-letter.patch or if > --numbered-files is passed, 0) if present, or the previous series' cover > letter. That's a good idea. Actually I don't see any reason why by default it isn't 0000-v2-cover-letter.patch. If it was it would diminish the need to warn people before overwriting 0000-cover-letter.patch. -- Felipe Contreras