From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA4E1F5AE for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 00:25:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232582AbhD2AYN (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:24:13 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52202 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231564AbhD2AYM (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:24:12 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D6CDC06138B for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id u16so47549211oiu.7 for ; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:23:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yebFPc7x/XckoiyUzek1GemcZH2xxzf/suzPuHdIN9c=; b=Q1U5ElTbSGw26cJEyiUGu67xtjtfhOLfFYWg1KGyrK2nuYvo6oPIlQybMMRa9E4cbA 6xIwfSnTzhKTAqnvmiAjJH2cI6EK9Si16qr1LHqwB5w/WnXxsF1V5hBYM71r745NsJQD 2M9a+pLAvSale5/0wBukAFv+WWycPUpatwuF38f+LZ0GGUeXP1zkxLQ/nqwOzvLlNIwA wlKNUFttQe+XHuTU1Y/BVpGTtjupIMfaDz6JHhtZ6zWg4L5BSfxLh3K8VLuujrlmx8zk 9nFCEcI2yoHfJqtYwqaOu31Q2pBbUaueo/LaF1qq5imJoBEqveNUEx0XSPk0eHmWtRLZ py5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yebFPc7x/XckoiyUzek1GemcZH2xxzf/suzPuHdIN9c=; b=SCJJW6W2E6m4hpzGMQoX3hRTxnqA9OGnTnawW2MHAEmybJdo1WV+b64ing9eu8JfZj DjXISMvv7dS1dL5TCj4zu9dBv45/hu450e7joI81TT/EqcZXH4mzsFsNOgPcZUkO2Bbu pbszAQtGCfPtYyQjFcWIoLSXwHRk8P4ZixYkCycOge3q6Ybnd7WIW4k3gOiYcV16Nmdt Uzd9IApmcvy7hEggXjWNYdtuGdLxN2ioGlPJL5MxFoLG+vp1HQvv57g4taRLPPDYpomR vP5pTl72mB5/yGcj4I6H1mKfiViWYTjDMkRbmauusKyEY2b36zFCrQ1EqFK7MiAdavw8 /C7A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532370iOCkLczBFa1NmzJr9iwPtoLlcbXZXbeS+AHGFjRZ3Ori8f 9TjwEye3N3tAEsQkfwt14/3P2hN0r2H2nQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4N9oBkX98D6wBDZskRSp2ZrzT7KO+WgiMreA2uuHKRIvnlqTxy37odz6bhnU/TieaGR888g== X-Received: by 2002:aca:1e16:: with SMTP id m22mr22303740oic.153.1619655805403; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:23:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2806:2f0:4060:638f:a2c5:89ff:fe0c:1151]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j5sm394479oou.9.2021.04.28.17.23.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 19:23:18 -0500 From: Felipe Contreras To: =?UTF-8?B?QW50b2luZSBCZWF1cHLDqQ==?= , git@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <6089fc7675b95_a9ef2089d@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: <87fszfafkh.fsf@angela.anarc.at> References: <87mttofs5t.fsf@angela.anarc.at> <60836fa129078_ff602089c@natae.notmuch> <87k0osfpt8.fsf@angela.anarc.at> <60839422353fc_10cb9208c7@natae.notmuch> <87fszfafkh.fsf@angela.anarc.at> Subject: RE: how to rename remote branches, the long way Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Antoine Beaupr=C3=A9 wrote: > On 2021-04-23 22:44:34, Felipe Contreras wrote: > = > [...] > = > Well, that attempt at working with git upstream went about as bad as I > expected. I was afraid I'd get ignored or worse, get dragged into the > naming debate. > = > Seems I got both, amazingly enough. I guess that I'll take that as a > "no, not welcome here" and move on... Do not take my response as representative of the views community. I do believe there's value in your patch, I'm just not personally interested in exploring it. I don't see much value in renaming branches, especially on a distributed SCM where the names are replicated in dozens, potentially thousands of repositories. But that's just me. Cheers. -- = Felipe Contreras=