git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Derrick Stolee <derrickstolee@github.com>
To: "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, 程洋 <chengyang@xiaomi.com>
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	何浩 <hehao@xiaomi.com>, "Xin7 Ma 马鑫" <maxin7@xiaomi.com>,
	石奉兵 <shifengbing@xiaomi.com>, 凡军辉 <fanjunhui@xiaomi.com>,
	王汉基 <wanghanji@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] upload-pack: skip parse-object re-hashing of "want" objects
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2022 10:36:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6018c526-4641-8374-8802-cfda5be330c3@github.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YxfSRkEiiP4TyZTM@coredump.intra.peff.net>

On 9/6/2022 7:05 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> This patch teaches both code paths to use the new SKIP_HASH_CHECK flag
> for parse_object(). You can see the speed-up in p5600, which does a
> blob:none clone followed by a checkout. The savings for git.git are
> modest:
> 
>   Test                          HEAD^             HEAD
>   ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>   5600.3: checkout of result    2.23(4.19+0.24)   1.72(3.79+0.18) -22.9%
> 
> But the savings scale with the number of bytes. So on a repository like
> linux.git with more files, we see more improvement (in both absolute and
> relative numbers):
> 
>   Test                          HEAD^                HEAD
>   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   5600.3: checkout of result    51.62(77.26+2.76)    34.86(61.41+2.63) -32.5%
> 
> And here's an even more extreme case. This is the android gradle-plugin
> repository, whose tip checkout has ~3.7GB of files:
> 
>   Test                          HEAD^               HEAD
>   --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   5600.3: checkout of result    79.51(90.84+5.55)   40.28(51.88+5.67) -49.3%
> 
> Keep in mind that these timings are of the whole checkout operation.

These numbers are _very_ impressive for this user-facing scenario.

>   Benchmark 1: GIT_PROTOCOL=version=2 git.old upload-pack ../gradle-plugin <input
>     Time (mean ± σ):     50.884 s ±  0.239 s    [User: 51.450 s, System: 1.726 s]
>     Range (min … max):   50.608 s … 51.025 s    3 runs
> 
>   Benchmark 2: GIT_PROTOCOL=version=2 git.new upload-pack ../gradle-plugin <input
>     Time (mean ± σ):      9.728 s ±  0.112 s    [User: 10.466 s, System: 1.535 s]
>     Range (min … max):    9.618 s …  9.842 s    3 runs
> 
>   Summary
>     'GIT_PROTOCOL=version=2 git.new upload-pack ../gradle-plugin <input' ran
>       5.23 ± 0.07 times faster than 'GIT_PROTOCOL=version=2 git.old upload-pack ../gradle-plugin <input'
> 
> So a server would see an 80% reduction in CPU serving the initial
> checkout of a partial clone for this repository.

Very nice!

> In both cases skipping the extra hashing on the server should be pretty
> safe. The client doesn't trust the server anyway, so it will re-hash all
> of the objects via index-pack.

Definitely safe for this target scenario.

> There is one thing to note, though: the
> change in get_reference() affects not just pack-objects, but rev-list,
> git-log, etc. We could use a flag to limit to index-pack here, but we
> may already skip hash checks in this instance. For commits, we'd skip
> anything we load via the commit-graph. And while before this commit we
> would check a blob fed directly to rev-list on the command-line, we'd
> skip checking that same blob if we found it by traversing a tree.

It's worth also mentioning that since you isolated the change to
get_reference(), it is only skipping the parse for the requested tips
of the revision walk. As we follow commits and trees to other objects
we do not use parse_object() but instead use the appropriate method
(parse_commit(), parse_tree(), and do not even parse blobs).

This is additionally confirmed that p0001-rev-list.sh has no measurable
change in results with this commit, even when disabling the commit-graph.

> The exception for both is if --verify-objects is used. In that case,
> we'll skip this optimization, and the new test makes sure we do this
> correctly.

The test for this is clever. Thanks for adding it.

Code and test look good.

Thanks,
-Stolee

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-07 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-11  8:09 Partial-clone cause big performance impact on server 程洋
2022-08-11 17:22 ` Jonathan Tan
2022-08-13  7:55   ` 回复: [External Mail]Re: " 程洋
2022-08-13 11:41     ` 程洋
2022-08-15  5:16     ` ZheNing Hu
2022-08-15 13:15       ` 程洋
2022-08-12 12:21 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-08-14  6:48 ` Jeff King
2022-08-15 13:18   ` Derrick Stolee
2022-08-15 14:50     ` [External Mail]Re: " 程洋
2022-08-17 10:22     ` 程洋
2022-08-17 13:41       ` Derrick Stolee
2022-08-18  5:49         ` Jeff King
2022-09-01  6:53   ` 程洋
2022-09-01 16:19     ` Jeff King
2022-09-05 11:17       ` 程洋
2022-09-06 18:38         ` Jeff King
2022-09-06 22:58           ` [PATCH 0/3] speeding up on-demand fetch for blobs in partial clone Jeff King
2022-09-06 23:01             ` [PATCH 1/3] parse_object(): allow skipping hash check Jeff King
2022-09-07 14:15               ` Derrick Stolee
2022-09-07 20:44                 ` Jeff King
2022-09-06 23:05             ` [PATCH 2/3] upload-pack: skip parse-object re-hashing of "want" objects Jeff King
2022-09-07 14:36               ` Derrick Stolee [this message]
2022-09-07 14:45                 ` Derrick Stolee
2022-09-07 20:50                   ` Jeff King
2022-09-07 19:26               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-07 20:36                 ` Jeff King
2022-09-07 20:48                   ` [BUG] t1800: Fails for error text comparison rsbecker
2022-09-07 21:55                     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-07 22:23                       ` rsbecker
2022-09-07 21:02                   ` [PATCH 2/3] upload-pack: skip parse-object re-hashing of "want" objects Jeff King
2022-09-07 22:07                     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-08  5:04                       ` Jeff King
2022-09-08 16:41                         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-06 23:06             ` [PATCH 3/3] parse_object(): check commit-graph when skip_hash set Jeff King
2022-09-07 14:46               ` Derrick Stolee
2022-09-07 19:31               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-09-08 10:39                 ` [External Mail]Re: " 程洋
2022-09-08 18:42                   ` Jeff King
2022-09-07 14:48             ` [PATCH 0/3] speeding up on-demand fetch for blobs in partial clone Derrick Stolee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6018c526-4641-8374-8802-cfda5be330c3@github.com \
    --to=derrickstolee@github.com \
    --cc=chengyang@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=fanjunhui@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hehao@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=maxin7@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=shifengbing@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=wanghanji@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).