From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::1:20]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A532F1F54E for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 16:17:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: dcvr.yhbt.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=gmx.net header.i=@gmx.net header.b="G9L3VCtn"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238858AbiGNQRt (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 12:17:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46124 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229493AbiGNQRr (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2022 12:17:47 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D093661D70 for ; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 09:17:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1657815459; bh=JPt8spO7EtdeQU98XVFReWlb5HqQVo3cwfLW1E1EXaE=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=G9L3VCtnTxHdRjtn2u+1nKMud5lUBm7D15P11eFrijBbZ6fWCbf2WfK+cKfIOwlWR l8TFLKqNudXJKPPb3Erj7N90pMPWZ+ons0grctWyrk+4xywRxp28tXjltgW3m+Oqj/ CAaOwQ6Fc9ST46CjBGdzJq7ymi0Ij0fURV/OJrxI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [172.21.23.67] ([89.1.215.236]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx105 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MYNNy-1nzMMT1eBm-00VNAm; Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:17:39 +0200 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:17:39 +0200 (CEST) From: Johannes Schindelin To: Junio C Hamano cc: Glen Choo , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: gc/bare-repo-discovery (was Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2022, #03; Mon, 11)) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <5ps2q552-1rr3-7161-4181-31556pp2ns12@tzk.qr> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:s/nAnADZmAPDiKPAZyn5g8VfC8d3LnjvBX96xk1WnogkiojZj+0 A6Lo2ucald3BySIB6mla+xZ5QGxSfW+3mKHLX29X+ml4bgJNnY99L7f9169SlA6jnbqTeen dJoy6cpJ2sGPbVvjh5sOhHvqZKOkZSk/WQ0k/F03qH/lDeT1hiL8S3K4Sv6Be5TeamxwUtI m3xciw8vbAoBQkl4SpXAw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:X/iRPcQIUrw=:4cA3yz3pqWQ9tAxUsZl72H OM8F5WFzdN67RarheJfCC3M0JIlWgrL7bTdeJbtI0YGM7weqpojksSDg5N6RPNni0dUyQCWfF zjimmO+qB5HmDI0jXlVpqfQ/DMbNZBj0fk9hwklEssHmn7OxnXpE/XieiMut1Eu4NOoLu8Cxq u4vEKojRKw7ltFWE9yrxfdsdNzM4GnWCZsqOoGnOa/yRtHlB3MBO7cnBzQd/mzEFz0vkBFIWJ W8iQ4iaZmEppphymFNvIr97SlLbg/ix188b6t0kKjimlTibTdUTW8wjrYmLlA2qzU17HDLk3X Pv82+TfARW1QQRfYLDZ+LHVx8F4PCM5E+MqQNIIdgvvKLlosK7uwQPod58jyjpryFgr10pavK hArCfMsu2mleBFbBiLFGAZZHCoUNcD3UQOJPZWoik04+7Vv2FXbDK4LBKHf1DgKq03klDATJd fqst+e+4HLps8UKUeM1svVGFZICH3NP8t3f0wZi5U51j1O1hJqNDZPHrUuXlJE4uBjT6tTZFz cYSq5FE1VKzUMmDfGnzNZ4PGT7rR4m9ZolQQe6KCHctvdxQFM2N1VVFsktY5ALwA/M7DO79tZ OSEzLIFGkOp25eZP/jDuFQv28Q952gFnFfItPjR6eGORzd1daMiwsPVqqZpLUffiaHFhiOfns +qcyuXfX993KuPJnoeN71xoLpl35Fo/717LoNDHDphR520nnQLUON+rSQhWQhHVC5Sj2qQ+/l l3lhce1v+Ebj0RfH115iiB8oE0hmmssoIOOThQDnKXWg9sy5fRmXopNQuVoynHecYwUUuBmM0 6lQ9Hlbjk279OH+ffGS+QQE6ydbJ5V0VptfO+NPHywfaV4trQoZQ9/12c6MMzUvC11T7f4CiE W3pNvMxFqrAxhxFLxZGrfMcqxad0hcVRGubTVxzH2daSpkOl4QmAVueW2TSIcSUcq7t2x7frw J7bxdIgPWw29DUwuBfr6Ty5BCaUGSvHmXi07pav3ltw710+3cT+i6mG4EBKSZKIjVZL1oUcmS w15pK9sW1q/1ZOoXa3PivyBLAyMocBrrJJM9FP42ZIhgI51ZEFIwfOOJR+Y97iiAnExefplJb eoVCIUpXYbHR3xNW4Dk1NWF18hKIsz9b2VeS9I8Wz3QxJE+q2sL/excqQ== Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Glen Choo writes: > > > I also noted your distaste for the `discovery.*` namespace (fair > > enough). To avoid a reroll-of-the-reroll, I was hoping that we could > > agree on something on-list (thread here [1]) before I send out the nex= t > > version. > > I found your idea of adding this new one in the safe.* hierarchy > quite reasonable. "safe.discoveredBareRepository =3D yes / no" may be > quote a mouthful, but I do not think I can think of anything better. I would find `safe.bareRepository =3D true` or `false` more intuitive, and more concise. And if there should be an option to ignore bare repositories when discovering a Git repository, it could be a tristate, with `ignore` being the value to trigger that mode. Thanks, Dscho