Re: [PATCH 1/2] test: completion: add tests for __git_complete

[Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>]

Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Denton Liu wrote:
> > Hi Felipe,
> > 
> > On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 01:23:01PM -0600, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  t/t9902-completion.sh | 7 +++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/t/t9902-completion.sh b/t/t9902-completion.sh
> > > index a1c4f1f6d4..2e59fe4de0 100755
> > > --- a/t/t9902-completion.sh
> > > +++ b/t/t9902-completion.sh
> > > @@ -2380,4 +2380,11 @@ test_expect_success 'sourcing the completion script clears cached --options' '
> > >  	verbose test -z "$__gitcomp_builtin_notes_edit"
> > >  '
> > >  
> > > +test_expect_success '__git_complete' '
> > > +	__git_complete foo __git_main &&
> > > +	test "$(type -t __git_wrap__git_main)" == function &&
> > 
> > s/==/=/ for this and the other patch.
> 
> Sure, I'll include that in the next version.
> 
> But I expect people will make further comments on the whole method to
> find out if a function exists.

I just noticed there's already a check for that in git-completion.bash:

	if declare -f $completion_func >/dev/null 2>/dev/null

I suppose that's prefered to: if test "$(type -t func)" = function

-- 
Felipe Contreras