From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27DE1F4B4 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726325AbgL0R3w (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:29:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38096 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726230AbgL0R3v (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Dec 2020 12:29:51 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x22e.google.com (mail-oi1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A831EC061794 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 09:29:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 9so9439826oiq.3 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 09:29:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=94jHEdmavUsPfVxd5xgifUJpkP28BQxIGQH3RRuWVkA=; b=VLxsy4Cp0gKyXNMvGmAlLEnIKvm/WgL1tHtpAjN5bmTpisDHf333hr3fh+H0ZDPtpu L6mym77ec0kew7a0pN3Bjn0osSNzdgaXXh9/I1aqplbe+vmgHDwd2eCxQUYUlcUdAmLJ 6UHm/laZV2OWak9THoR4S5w6BWwmqtE9p4Imm8INpNcK0X+zCOf1MQFH3BlZpmI2yoz8 DUz/XHLeQTl596dd1X1Nm3T3NWA0EwHaZnntqqYiuVFJdsagcWLz4LSRH7aU1a2/WXle KnNlreJnEoJpSR5UVTHZNTbN2rx5oICfGS4hDekJLI0u2946lNTtAXd3O1qgJk4wVOfN sTMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=94jHEdmavUsPfVxd5xgifUJpkP28BQxIGQH3RRuWVkA=; b=Pxn2bm5hCJTafTJmaMeMCzjdTnmvDkDPwKDKQRumO9YSyn+8QkPCfFkn3tjsJUMg/n fnN9AnUm5PXYNuhsL0BACrLiGkAw5cfi2yafWB5Qtc8V12AlRE8fe1to6MYSVcV23QMq dKXZdbcNm9dj2CwAVBCUWjCHASKUGKDKzsmdwHBwhfEukzPiI9i4lGXXolI2frgiHtDh 5uGk2gr772U7Mw3oU8XeCIwAJ4j3L4FM84XLR6nAf5nnf8a8wplQThYTjZEmbO+R7rq4 ztRyqmeQdz6KZR0JYql7k5WDn8P26cnvEhxNS2TBt5EG+391m1ZBxU5VScpT6nfwIweU 4YCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530MS37Okvsk2GbmP/htDFtx9PNSFgzBW7LBFBK4KBD/9B3Owk0N recCPaOc3Ozjzy4CVpxHjxI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzUZFtWGLKc+K9gnhaDQkfzOb1uSHLu502jDN4mxSJOWdKKCofAc0NysWU+U2k2EDoyhSLZUA== X-Received: by 2002:aca:33d5:: with SMTP id z204mr9787709oiz.81.1609090151110; Sun, 27 Dec 2020 09:29:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (189-209-26-110.static.axtel.net. [189.209.26.110]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 65sm8690754otp.35.2020.12.27.09.29.09 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 27 Dec 2020 09:29:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 11:29:08 -0600 From: Felipe Contreras To: Junio C Hamano , Felipe Contreras Cc: =?UTF-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsCBCamFybWFzb24=?= , Pratyush Yadav , David Aguilar , Seth House , Git Mailing List , Christian Couder , git@sfconservancy.org Message-ID: <5fe8c464bc190_e22d2086a@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: References: <5fdc18a91c402_f2faf20837@natae.notmuch> <20201218054947.GA123376@ellen> <5fdc7a7d3a933_f4673208d0@natae.notmuch> <20201219001358.GA153461@ellen> <20201221042501.GA146725@ellen> <5fe033e0ec278_96932089d@natae.notmuch> <20201221073633.GA157132@ellen> <5fe134eeaec71_11498208f9@natae.notmuch> <20201222150124.mnfcyofm4qyvvj4n@yadavpratyush.com> <5fe2c64bd3790_17f6720897@natae.notmuch> <5fe2d89c212e8_18dc12083e@natae.notmuch> <5fe36790793ae_2354120839@natae.notmuch> <87r1ngufmf.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <5fe424d0528a2_7855a208d3@natae.notmuch> <87o8ijv124.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <5fe4b33dbc028_19c920834@natae.notmuch> Subject: Re: Nobody is THE one making contribution Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano wrote: > Felipe Contreras writes: > > >> Not "I signed off on my subjective approval of this patch & what it's > >> for etc.", which seems to be closer to your interpretation. > > > > Why does it have to be only one meaning? > > > > Junio doesn't sign off on a patch that he doesn't think is good. > > Same happens with all the lieutenants of Linux. > The reason why some patches do not carry sign-off might be because > the sender does not wish to certify and that's OK. That's one reason. > But if you are arguing that when you write "Signed-off-by:" your > sign-off can mean something other than what DCO says it means, The DCO has clause (d), which clearly states the developer must agree that a record of his/her contribution is maintained indefinitely (and that includes his/her sign off). So there's at least two meanings in the DCO itself. Additionally, that's the meaning of the phrase "sign off" in English; I approve of this. -- Felipe Contreras