From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E1C1F4B4 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 10:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726618AbgLVJ7P (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 04:59:15 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54566 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726604AbgLVJ7O (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 04:59:14 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x232.google.com (mail-oi1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::232]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45774C0613D3 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 01:58:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-oi1-x232.google.com with SMTP id 9so14229041oiq.3 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 01:58:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BQXIofhr1qCgrM4v+lNb4skzDSpCJ2XWOVhsyn6fDPw=; b=VALilPLAmkyOy/6hSu3sssJxrH0ttFHn2SI6MBSA4/HmQiGFSZZqrUUUxqEgvBKamb RGI0I7Jv1z/XZo/U5QiY/q12W0IdwyuL4tjfRRK8yFKnEkHo5kvKV+s55yE6G3UIzzRn G5+GErYZvDWMJr7d2G2Wmd6Ffh+VzuzSjthxdI+z0VgfsI4BYou6G7G/zJ6r8HCm3ZP5 bCo29g7Q96RRhVLYNbpG/FNpoPyVC4QiponA2y/epcRPmYAVWjOav+Hmi607jQfVtkfP 9x1g5Pff0pKppqN5RampR7bzzouvHZYA0d6jyDytLaFFSosfG2o4PbAQ+gqCc4UNS2ti VOqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BQXIofhr1qCgrM4v+lNb4skzDSpCJ2XWOVhsyn6fDPw=; b=O/I25hfvZ3JaHV8JXIXeBM7j9Fs3uE9jwP30kC+SHgsuj3lOckeSlipD5kz8oqM/QD 7X+FL96N5G7ia+wSw/5sA6MVS+9JZOWiGbhcMNUPSv7lf3DLetFYMkRvDM0yEUbMLECi FmZM/FEpzvJDA3bz13KhkIjdsc4Pc89+RmtKfJMp1SjzvOlDdxdTY+XQ3S0wVxiI/gV3 v3MQ2jsklHuisLZvmTLVhcf+IzFL9Pq1d8BklgBsBJC26OrppGTw7zAIWvpyoZ65Wd0t cgy0g96CZgEHz2eIxa60UcuJYYK5cQfWtewVQ5OCfNv35eLf/+VDVVzVkaNZqd6DK9KO 0EhQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53341+eSlwWIaRWZ7TxaLKeJ7RYlg0L3aygoDMc6Lx6w0HZKndz0 aa/2mpZjo7OCq3/V8OSbEyM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTVTbEBZn95o/6N6Yn/HAWxzT3KnNrHlyHDAPgIrFrpUzp/oStASGElwnJ9CS6DJjaaurvVg== X-Received: by 2002:aca:47c2:: with SMTP id u185mr13532866oia.56.1608631091739; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 01:58:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (189-209-26-110.static.axtel.net. [189.209.26.110]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y35sm4395525otb.5.2020.12.22.01.58.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 22 Dec 2020 01:58:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 03:58:09 -0600 From: Felipe Contreras To: Junio C Hamano , Git Mailing List Cc: David Aguilar , Seth House , Christian Couder , git@sfconservancy.org, Felipe Contreras Message-ID: <5fe1c3319a9ee_147e42083c@natae.notmuch> In-Reply-To: References: <20201217175037.GA80608@ellen> <5fdc0e6dd79a7_f2faf208a1@natae.notmuch> <20201218023534.GA117762@ellen> <5fdc18a91c402_f2faf20837@natae.notmuch> <20201218054947.GA123376@ellen> <5fdc7a7d3a933_f4673208d0@natae.notmuch> <20201219001358.GA153461@ellen> <20201221042501.GA146725@ellen> <5fe033e0ec278_96932089d@natae.notmuch> <20201221073633.GA157132@ellen> <5fe134eeaec71_11498208f9@natae.notmuch> Subject: Re: Code of conduct violation? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Junio C Hamano wrote: > Felipe Contreras writes: > > > David Aguilar wrote: > >> Just a heads-up that Felipe has a history on this list of creating > >> long, never-ending, pointless rant threads so sometimes the best > >> course of action is to ignore him. > > > > I think this can be considered a personal attack, which goes against the > > code of conduct. > > A PLC member here. > > As CoC document outlines in its Enforcement section, the project > leadership committee will review complaints of this kind, and may > issue a statement later, but we do not encourage list participants > to hold People's court publicly on the matter. That's fine. In real life courts don't have to be open, but accusations and decisions do. The public is supposed to learn which sort of behavior is acceptable, and which not, from the behavior of others, and past decisions. In fact it's from examples that most people learn the rules, including future judges. -- Felipe Contreras