From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS53758 23.128.96.0/24 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB181F4B4 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 20:49:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235873AbhDEUtk (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:49:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38686 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235691AbhDEUth (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:49:37 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x32a.google.com (mail-ot1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FCC4C061756 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 13:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id g8-20020a9d6c480000b02901b65ca2432cso12582942otq.3 for ; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 13:49:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fNYpXeoJl2cHK5J7BZO/4W8ZIiXMWqaRmUJESO41wfI=; b=kJNJt/+WKRz9h+Gjcyd2YSeDXWU8aDwNBhysbT8qIJyOiajGYg/z57DzDSCygXJzmH IRW67t9aaxgxH+mETFNC7g7e38z9oQn9Vgp5Vrt7IHFyLDDxkWG3XOsWP7RHqhn4sgLi /V+MA/3r6kPEdCd5N7N/gHKUCMojAqTdG4aPj92Bd92fh5Pn71gbtZmJ/0suErqi3e3N aMezA2Jarg4UWWEhRXmRMoO0iRO9S3qITxcAY7S50Xub81G0r6XBTQ0WV5mtVnjfPdGF H3SjnNDwih9/v2AwA6SU0OcmwQmterdiyyIzUwTjhxr1Nncy7Zy2niu+SESKRH2MCEUe /jmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fNYpXeoJl2cHK5J7BZO/4W8ZIiXMWqaRmUJESO41wfI=; b=DSE45hSlHuxQWrF/WWAjwhMOym8qnvMraPR04woaD9L89hW2dOtuNuTwc1BZr2Lsra RUI3eJ6WIEijSNQk1+rGjN9w6feo8GXeSvVtNXsyZhwIDSMH4PjJDZXW8KjfoLd9rywC jCKk/0HIuyB9gZXjkFrErOgvllOdHO7UKEd1NDLn7rP1qEXMKN/8xsuwCZvxGwOxjqCU aVaBy5Xb0x6r23OgVqvBGpezNUEXSE/fw6ZHLzZZd414Xynylnzhc9unQvTBQCsqE13k ONuBUm3e6iXgB3o6gu9VwLCYxcTa8uFoc8qWLzHxEA2e8bmG1PCpCSkwUwBTPpYUc72P VArQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532h1naMqo7RJpOLZ93q9+wL0RQr7c/GgDuzclLgy/SXtrhoEfYh wSPOGiQ2vFEieGhsJqk+BFdEmZSGfSB2xQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzgyZPZu0bgWnnn0Wfqbh/G9wdTDnsyKywDSH78aoR3NmBK2+QURhfGtq2gAdt0IHdaLYdDlw== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:2f45:: with SMTP id h63mr23210614otb.372.1617655770342; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 13:49:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1700:e72:80a0:91f9:c820:22ba:fec7? ([2600:1700:e72:80a0:91f9:c820:22ba:fec7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n6sm3654031oop.48.2021.04.05.13.49.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Apr 2021 13:49:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: should git maintenance prefetch be taught to honor remote.fetch refspec? To: Junio C Hamano , Tom Saeger Cc: git@vger.kernel.org References: <3bfd9a88-10f9-df71-bf96-f9c5654e48eb@gmail.com> <20210402182716.trbaflsjcvouff2y@brm-x62-17.us.oracle.com> <41dc2961-7ba5-a882-3416-45631e2cbb33@gmail.com> <20210405203832.x275fqoinfsw5gik@dhcp-10-154-153-195.vpn.oracle.com> From: Derrick Stolee Message-ID: <5c432329-1e42-c29c-242d-a2955174296b@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:49:29 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On 4/5/2021 4:47 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Tom Saeger writes: > >> $ git config --local --get-regexp "pr-924" >> remote.pr-924.url https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git >> remote.pr-924.fetch +refs/tags/pr-924/derrickstolee/maintenance/refspec-v1 >> >> Seems legal, fetch even works > > Yes. For a ref that is one-shot use (like PR tags), this does not > make much sense, but > > [remote "submaintainer1"] > url = ... repository of submaintainer #1 ... > fetch = master > tagopts = --no-tags > > is a reasonable thing to have for those who regularly work with > submaintainer(s) of their project. They'd do > > $ git pull submaintainer1 > > to accept the work their submaintainers have done. Thanks for the extra testing! I'll be sure to fix this bug in v2. -Stolee