git@vger.kernel.org mailing list mirror (one of many)
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Rubén Justo" <rjusto@gmail.com>
To: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
	Emily Shaffer <nasamuffin@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] improve bugreports
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2024 21:27:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5acafee5-dd65-49f1-bc2d-f959ed4bc9e1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPig+cRFqddMqTxCENnknv3Agcq3_bxGmB1sQTmJNb=xNYg1aw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 11:09:02PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 3:04 AM Rubén Justo <rjusto@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 06:32:35PM +0100, Rubén Justo wrote:
> > > Let's try to improve the readability of the bug reports we receive.
> >
> > This series received no response.  One option may be because it went
> > unnoticed, another because it may not add value.  I'm going to give it
> > another try and I'll quietly :-) take silence as confirmation of the
> > second option.
> >
> > I'll try to increase the chances of getting a "looks good" by CC'ing
> > some folks involved in the bugreport tool.
> 
> For what it's worth, when I read the cover letter of this series, I
> thought it was going to clean up the list of questions to eliminate
> redundancy. In particular, of the three questions:
> 
>    What did you expect to happen?
>    What happened instead?
>    What's different between what you expected
>         and what actually happened?
> 
> the final one seems to repeat what the first two ask, and it is common
> when answering the third question for people to simply repeat what was
> said in response to an earlier question.

Certainly, a diagnostic questionnaire can always be improved.
Unfortunately I do not have a better wording to offer here to reduce
that sense of repetition.

Thanks for your response.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-04-01 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-23 17:32 [PATCH 0/2] improve bugreports Rubén Justo
2024-03-23 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] bugreport: add a new line between questions Rubén Justo
2024-03-23 17:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] bugreport: add a mark to each proposed questions Rubén Justo
2024-04-01 19:30   ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2024-04-01 19:33     ` Rubén Justo
2024-03-31  7:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] improve bugreports Rubén Justo
2024-04-01  3:09   ` Eric Sunshine
2024-04-01  9:29     ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-01 19:27     ` Rubén Justo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5acafee5-dd65-49f1-bc2d-f959ed4bc9e1@gmail.com \
    --to=rjusto@gmail.com \
    --cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nasamuffin@google.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://80x24.org/mirrors/git.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).